期刊文献+

军医大学学员人格类型与学业成绩关系的探讨 被引量:5

Relationships between personality type and academic performance of military medical undergraduates
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 分析某军医大学不同专业学员的人格类型与学业成绩的关系,探讨其优势人格,为人才选拔、教学改革提供参考.方法 应用迈尔斯—布里格斯性格测试量表(Myers-Briggs type indicator,MBTI),调查某军医大学2098名学员的个性类型.结果 ①学员总体人格类型较多的是外向—感觉—思考—判断型,占比14.1%;内向—感觉—思考—判断型,占比11.8%;内向—直觉—情感—认知型,占比11.7%.比较不同人格类型的学员,其学习成绩差异具有统计学意义(x2 =73.610,P=0.005).外向—直觉—情感—认知型、内向—感觉—思考—认知型、内向—感觉—情感—认知型和外向—直觉—情感—判断型的学员成绩优秀的比例较高,成绩较差的比例较低.②在该校8个专业中,临床医学专业、中医学专业、心理学专业(医学方向)、生物技术专业、护理学专业、药学专业、公共事业管理专业学员的不同人格类型的学习成绩比较,差异均无统计学意义(x2=56.375、36.759、38.803、39.789、51.985、39.886、48.892,P>0.05),只有临床医学专业(海军方向)学员不同人格类型的学习成绩相比,差异具有统计学意义(x2=75.506,P=0.003).具有外向—直觉—情感—认知型、内向—直觉—思考—认知型人格类型的临床医学专业(海军方向)学员,其成绩优秀者比例较高;临床医学专业(海军方向)学员数量较多的学员人格类型是外向—感觉—思考—判断型,占比19.8%;内向—直觉—情感—认知型,占比15.7%;外向—感觉—情感—判断型,占比10.3%;内向—直觉—思考—判断型,占比10.1%.结论 某军医大学学员中,学业出众的优势人格与数量占优势的典型人格各不相同;除了临床医学专业(海军方向)学员之外,该军医大学各专业学员的优势人格并不明显. Objective To analyze personality type of military medical university undergraduates among different specialties for talent selection and teaching reform.Methods Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator,2098 undergraduates of a military medical university were surveyed.Results (1) The percentages of Extroversion-Sensing-Thinking-Judging (ESTJ,14.1%),Intuition-Sensing-Thinking-Judging (ISTJ,11.8%) and Introversion-Intuition-Feeling-Perception (INFP,11.7%) were the highest in military medical undergraduates.It showed statistical significances in the performances among different personality types (x2 =73.610,P =0.005),in which the percentages of good marks were higher in Extroversion-Intuition-Feeling-Perception(ENFP),Introversion-Sensing-Thinking-Perception (ISTP),Introversion-Sensing-Feeling-Perception (ISFP) and Extroversion-Intuition-Feeling-Judging (ENFJ) types while their percentages of poor marks were on the contrary.(2) It showed no statistical significances in the performances among personality type in all 8 specialties(x2 =56.375,36.759,38.803,39.789,51.985,39.886,48.892,P 〉 0.05) except naval medicine specialties(x2 =75.506,P =0.003).For those specialized in naval medicine,the percentages of good marks were higher in ENFP and Introversion-IntuitionThinking-Perception (INTP) while the percentages of ESTJ (19.8%),INFP(15.7%),ExtroversionSensing-Feeling-Judging (ESFJ,10.3%) and Introversion-Intuition-Thinking-Judging (INTJ,10.1%)were the highest in quantity.Conclusions It is different between personality priorities that perform better and typical personality type that is in a greater number in military medical undergraduates.The advantages of personality type are unconspicuous except those specialized in naval medicine.Research on advantages of personality type is the basis of scientifically selecting people and teaching reform deeply.
作者 鲁娟 刘斌
出处 《中华医学教育杂志》 2016年第2期236-240,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education
基金 2013年度第二军医大学青年启动基金:“第二军医大学学员学习风格优化对策研究”(2013QN01)
关键词 军医大学学生 人格类型 学业成绩 优势人格 关系 Military medical undergraduates Personality type Academic performance Personality priorities Relationships
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1朱辉荣.论MBTI性格测评在创新人才选拔中的应用[J].黑龙江高教研究,2011,29(12):129-131. 被引量:14
  • 2Francis LJ, Butler A, Jones SH, Craig CL. Type patterns among active members of the Anglican Church: A perspective from England[J]. Mental Health Religion & Culture, 2007,(10): 435-443.DOI:10.1080/13694670600668382.
  • 3史灵,刘金兰.基于心理资本和MBTI人格影响机制的高校学生成长研究[J].河北科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,13(4):100-107. 被引量:16
  • 4杨渊,沈成晨,王永遐,卢瑶.大学生人格类型与学习风格浅谈[J].武汉冶金管理干部学院学报,2013,23(2):45-48. 被引量:11
  • 5Ziegert AL.The role of personality temperament and student learning in principles of economics: Further evidence[J].The Journal of Economic Education, 2000, 31(4):307-322.DOI:10.1080/00220480009596449.
  • 6Felder RM, Felder GN, Dietz EJ. The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes[J].Journal of Engineering Education, 2002, 91(1):3-17.DOI:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00667.

二级参考文献22

  • 1曾维希,张进辅.MBTI人格类型量表的理论研究与实践应用[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(2):255-260. 被引量:81
  • 2仲理峰.心理资本研究评述与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):482-487. 被引量:331
  • 3[美]奥托·克劳格,珍妮特·M.苏森,希尔·路特莱奇.赢在性格[M].王善平,等译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2005.173.
  • 4[美]保罗‘D·蒂戈冬,巴巴拉·巴伦一蒂戈尔.就业宝典[M].李楠,等,译.北京:中信出版社,2002:21,25,29,33.
  • 5[美]伊莎贝尔·布里格斯-迈尔斯,彼得·迈尔斯.天资差异[M].张荣建,译.重庆:重庆出版社,2008:序言.
  • 6过广宇.麦尔斯一碧瑞斯人格类型量表(Man)的理论及应用的初步研究[D].华东师范大学,2003.
  • 7http://www.xinli001.eom/eeahi/422/,MBTI职业性格测试(专业版).
  • 8http://www.apesk.cow./mbti/dati.asp,Mlrn职业性格测试完整版(静态题库).
  • 9Luthans F,Avolio B J,Walumbwa F O. The Psychological Capital of Chinese Workers:Exploring the Relationship with Performance[J].Management and Organization Review,2005,(02):249-271.
  • 10Luthans F,Youssef C M. Human,Social and Now Positive Psychological Capital Management:Investing in People for Competitive Advantage[J].{H}Organizational Dynamics,2004,(02):143-160.

共引文献28

同被引文献62

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部