期刊文献+

Phylogenetic framework for coevolutionary studies: a compass for exploring jungles of tangled trees

Phylogenetic framework for coevolutionary studies: a compass for exploring jungles of tangled trees
原文传递
导出
摘要 Phylogenetics is used to detect past evolutionary events, from how species originated to how their ecological interactions with other species arose, which can mirror cophylogenetic patterns. Cophylogenetic reconstructions uncover past ecological relationships between taxa through inferred coevolutionary events on trees, for example, codivergence, duplication, host-switching, and loss. These events can be detected by cophylogenetic analyses based on nodes and the length and branching pattern of the phylogenetic trees of symbiotic associations, for example, host-parasite. In the past 2 decades, algorithms have been developed for cophylogetenic analyses and implemented in different software, for ex ample, statistical congruence index and event-based methods. Based on the combination of these approaches, it is possible to integrate temporal information into cophylogenetical inference, such as es- timates of lineage divergence times between 2 taxa, for example, hosts and parasites. Additionally, the advances in phylogenetic biogeography applying methods based on parametric process models and combined Bayesian approaches, can be useful for interpreting coevolutionary histories in a scenario of biogeographical area connectivity through time. This article briefly reviews the basics of parasitology and provides an overview of software packages in cophylogenetic methods. Thus, the objective here is to present a phylogenetic framework for coevolutionary studies, with special emphasis on groups of parasitic organisms. Researchers wishing to undertake phylogeny-based coevolutionary studies can use this review as a "compass" when "walking" through jungles of tangled phylogenetic trees.
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第4期393-403,共11页 动物学报(英文版)
分类号 Q [生物学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献119

  • 1Althoff DM, Segraves KA, Johnson MTJ, 2014. Testing for coevolutionary di- versification: linking pattern with process. Trends Ecol Evo129:82-89.
  • 2Arise JC, 2009. Phylogeography: retrospect and prospect. J Biogeogr 36:3-1S.
  • 3Bansal MS, Aim EJ, Kellis M, 2013. Reconciliation revisited: handling mul- tiple optima when reconciling with duplication, transfer, and loss. J Comput Bio120:738-754.
  • 4Baudet C, Donati B, Sinaimeri B, Crescenzi P, Gautier C et al., 2014. Cophylogeny reconstruction via and approximate Bayesian computation. Sys Biol, 64:416--431.
  • 5Badets M, Whittington I, Lalubin F, Allienne JF, Maspimby JL et al., 2011. Correlating early evolution of parasitic platyhelminths to gondwana breakup. Sys Bio160:762-781.
  • 6Balbuena JA, Mfguez-Lozano R, Blasco-Costa I, 2013. PACo: a novel pro- crustes application to cophylogenetic analysis. PLoS ONE 8:e61048.
  • 7Brockhurst MA, Koskella B, 2013. Experimental coevolution of species inter- actions. Trends Ecol Evo128:367-375.
  • 8Brooks DR, 1981, Hennig's parasitological method: a proposed solution. Sys Zoo/30:229-249.
  • 9Carstens BC, Pelletier TA, Reid NM, Satler JD, 2013. How to fail at species delimitation? Mol Eco122:43694383.
  • 10Ceccarelli FS, Crozier RH, 2007. Dynamics of the evolution of Batesian mim- icry: molecular phylogenetic analysis of ant-mimicking Myrmarachne (Araneae: Salticidae) species and their ant models. J Evol Bio124:887-896.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部