摘要
目的观察对颈椎病患者实施不同间隔时间针刀治疗的临床疗效,以及是否会增加不良反应和增加治疗次数。方法将92例颈椎病患者随机分为治疗组47例、对照组45例。治疗组采用不间断针刀治疗,每日治疗1次;对照组采用间断性针刀治疗,10 d治疗1次。结果两组治疗次数、总有效率及术后不良反应均无明显差异(P>0.05),两组治疗周期及痊愈率存在显著性差异(P<0.05),治疗组平均治疗时间明显少于对照组(P<0.05),治疗组痊愈率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论不间断针刀治疗不会增加术后反应和治疗次数,可以明显缩短患者治疗周期,还可避免治疗期间的再劳再损,提高痊愈率。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of continual needle knife treatment for cervical spondylosis and whether it increases adverse reactions and the number of treatments.Method Ninety-two patients with cervical spondylosis were randomly allocated to a treatment group of 47 cases and a control group of 45 cases.The treatment group received continual needle knife therapy once every day and the control group,interrupted needle knife therapy once 10 days.Result There were no statistically significant differences in the number of treatments,the total efficacy rate and postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups（P〈0.05）.There were statistically significant differences in the treatment period and cure rate between the two groups（P〈0.05）.The treatment period was significantly shorter in the treatment group than in the control group（P〈0.05）.The cure rate was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion Continual needle knife therapy cannot increase postoperative adverse reactions and the number of treatments.It can significantly shorten the treatment period,avoid another injury and increase the cure rate in the patients.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2016年第8期986-988,共3页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基金
合肥市科技局课题[遵市科合社字(2013)49号]
关键词
颈椎病
小刀针
疗程
Cervical spondylosis
Little needle knife
The course of treatment
