摘要
目的：对自然联结量表（connectedness to nature scale,CNS）进行中文版修订和信效度检验。方法：采用翻译后量表对大学生进行施测,161名大学生完成了初测,289名大学生完成了再测。结果：1探索性因素分析表明,中文版自然联结量表具有一个维度,包括14个题项,一个主因素可解释总变异的29.476%;验证性因素表明,单因素模型对数据拟合程度良好（χ^2/df=1.837,RMSEA=0.045,GFI=0.953,NFI=0.868,CFI=0.934,IFI=0.935,TLI=0.920）;中文版自然联结量表相容效度良好,自然联结总分（CNS）和自我包含自然量表（the inclusion of nature in the self,INS）得分之间显著正相关（r=0.491,P〈0.01）;2中文版自然联结量表内部一致性信度为0.783,重测信度为0.901（P〈0.01）;3自然联结不存在性别差异和年级差异。结论：中文版自然联结量表具有良好的信效度,可以作为个人与自然关系的测量工具。
Objective：To revise connectedness to nature scale and examine its reliability and validity.Methods：161and 289 college students were investigated respectively.Results：1Exploring factor analysis indicated that the Chinese version of connectedness to nature scale included 14 items,extracted one factor and accumulated variance of29.476%;Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the one-dimension had good fitting index（χ^2/df=1.837,RMSEA=0.045,GFI=0.953,NFI=0.868,CFI=0.934,IFI=0.935,TLI=0.920）;Congruent validity of the Chinese version of connectedness to nature scale were acceptable.Connectedness to nature scale scores were significantly positively correlated with scores of the inclusion of nature in the self（r=0.491,P〈0.01）.2The Cronbach coefficient of the Chinese version of connectedness to nature scale was 0.783.The test-retest reliability was 0.901（P〈0.01）.3No significant differences of connectedness to nature were found in gender and grades.Conclusion：The Chinese version of connectedness to nature scale has good reliability and validity,which can used as an instrument to measure the relationship between individual and nature.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2016年第9期1347-1350,共4页
China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词
自然联结
自然联结量表
信度
效度
Connectedness to nature
Connectedness to nature scale
Reliability
Validity
