青年科学基金对我国高校青年教师科研绩效的影响——基于1995—2013年国家自然科学基金的实证分析被引量：24

The Influence of Youth Science Foundation on Research Performance for Youth University Teachers in China——Evidence from 1995 to 2013 NSFC Program Data for Life Sciences

原文传递

导出

摘要收集中国自然科学基金生命科学部1995—2013年在高校立项并结题的项目投入产出及执行数据,采用倾向值匹配和回归分析探寻青年科研基金的资助与高校青年教师科研绩效之间的因果关系。研究得出如下结论:获得青年基金能够显著提高高校青年教师未来的科研产出数量和质量;青年基金的获得属性是影响青年教师后续研究产出的主要变量,而资助额度的影响并不显著。建议应当适当扩大青年科研基金的资助范围,以覆盖更多的优秀青年教师为主,以调整资助额度为辅。 By collecting the data of the research projects in universities from National Natural Science Foundation of China in Life Sciences field from 1995 to 2013, through combining Propensity Score Matching with Regression Analysis, the casual effect between youth science fund and academic performance of young college teachers has been investigated. It is found that, firstly, the youth science fund has a significant positive effect on the quantity and quality of the research of young college teachers; secondly, the acquisition.attribute of funding is the main variable that influences the subsequent research output of young teachers, while the amount of funding has no significant effect on young college teachers＇ achievements. Therefore, it is suggested that the government should adjust its funding policies to prioritize extending the coverage of funding programs over increasing the amounts of funding to the young college teachers

作者王红梅智强费继鹏

机构地区中央财经大学政府管理学院

出处《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期91-99,共9页 Educational Research

基金国家自然科学基金项目"我国主体功能区差异化绩效评估:检验比较分析和政策调整"(项目编号:71203245)的研究成果

关键词马太效应青年科研基金倾向值匹配科研绩效 Matthew effect, youth scientific research fund, propensity soccer matching, research performance

分类号 G644 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1Lehman H C. Age and achievement [J]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton, 1953.
2Price D J, Price D D S. Little science,big science[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1965.
3Merton R K. The Matthew effect in science, Ih Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property [J]. Isis, 1988,.
4Allison P D, Long J S, Krauze T K. Cumulative advantage and inequality in science [J]. American Sociological Review, 1982, (5).
5牛萍,孟祥利,宿芬,曹凯.青年人才资助的“科研年龄”和“职业生涯早期”标准及其启示[J].中国科学基金,2013,27(1):18-21. 被引量：18
6Merton R K. The Matthew effect in science[J]. Science, 1968, (5).
7Arora A, Gambardella A. Public policy towards science: picking stars or spreading the wealth? [J]. Revue d'~ conomie industrielle, 1997, ( I ).
8Xie Y. Inequalities in Science[J]. Science, 2014, (344).
9Jacob B A, Lefgren L. The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity[J]. Journal of public economics, 2011, (9).
10Saygitov R T. The Impact of Funding through the RF President's Grants for Young Scientists (the field-Medicine) on Research Productivity: A Quasi-Experimental Study and a Brief Systematic Review [J]. PloS one, 2014, (1).