摘要
市场准入歧视已经成为出租车市场畸形发展、纠纷频发的主要诱因。比例原则作为行政法上的皇冠原则,借以考察政府在出租车市场领域的管制措施是否具有正当性极为便捷有效。法释义学上的比例原则分为三个子原则:适当性原则、必要性原则和均衡性原则。三个子原则之间表现为阶层式的逻辑结构,通过层层推导和过滤,可以满足对行政规范进行实体审查的要求。出租车准入歧视政策对出租车行政管制目标之实现有一定的正面推进作用,能够通过适当性原则审查;但是,由于存在相对于出租车准入歧视政策而言对公民权利限制更小的行政管制措施,准入歧视政策无法通过必要性原则审查;而且,该政策对公民权利的限制超出了所欲保护之公共利益的迫切程度而无法通过均衡性原则审查。
Market access discrimination has been a major incentive to the abnormal development of the taxi market and many disputes.The principle of proportionality known as＂the principle of crown＂is a very convenient and effective way for people to investigate weather the taxi market control measures made by the government has the legitimacy or not. The principle of proportionality has three sub-principles： the principle of appropriateness,the principle of necessity and the principle of balance,which have an hierarchical logical structure of their own and thus can review the administrative regulations through many derivations and filterings. Access discrimination has some positive effects over administrative control of the taxis,which is in line with the principle of appropriateness,nevertheless,it fails to meet the demand of the principle of necessity because there are some administrative control measures which have a less restrictions on the civil rights. Besides,those restrictions are beyond the urgency of the public interest which they intend to protect,thus they are unable to review the principle of the balance.
出处
《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期24-27,共4页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词
出租车
市场准入歧视
比例原则
taxi
market access discrimination
the principle of proportionality
