摘要
目的 探讨MR与超声检查在乳腺癌诊断中的临床应用价值,为临床更好地诊治乳腺癌提供参考依据。方法 选择2013年2月2日-2014年2月2日我院收治的疑似乳腺癌患者81例作为研究对象,所有患者均进行MR检查和超声检查,并在诊断结束后,比较分析两种诊断方式的灵敏度、特异度、准确性、误诊率、漏诊率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。结果 超声诊断的灵敏度、特异度、准确性、误诊率、漏诊率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为81.48%、85.19%、83.95%、14.81%、18.52%、73.33%、90.20%。MR诊断的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、误诊率、漏诊率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为92.59%、98.15%、96.20%、1.85%、7.41%、96.15%、96.36%,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论 MR与超声检查在乳腺癌诊断中均具有一定的诊断价值,但MR诊断乳腺癌的临床价值更优。
Objective To explore the clinical application value of MR and ultrasonic examination in the diagnosis of breast cancer and to provide basis for the better diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods 81 suspected breast cancer pa- tients from February 2,2013 to February 2,2014 of our hospital were selected as object for this study.MR examination and ultrasonic examination were conducted for all patients.At the end of diagnosis,sensitive degree,specificity,accuracy, misdiagnosisrate,omission diagnostic rate,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of two diagnosis meth- ods were compared and analyzed. Results The sensitive degree,speeificity,aceuracy,misdiagnosisrate,omission diagnostic rate,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ultrasonic diagnosis were respectively 81.48%,85.19%, 83.95%,14.81,18.52%,73.33% and 90.20%,which were respectively 92.59%,98.15%,96.20%,1.85%,7.41%,96.15% and 96.36% of MR diagnosis,and the difference was statistical significance （P〈0.05）. Conclusion MR and ultrasonic exami- nation has some value in diagnosis breast cancer,but the clinical value of MR is better in diagnosis breast cancer.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2016年第13期128-130,共3页
China Modern Medicine
基金
辽宁省鞍山市科学技术成果(鞍科鉴字[2013]22号)
关键词
磁共振检查
超声
乳腺癌
诊断价值
Magnetic resonance imaging
Ultrasonic sound
Breast cancer
Diagnosis value
