期刊文献+

最后通牒博弈的个体差异和种族文化差异 被引量:7

The Individual and Cultural Differences in the Ultimatum Game
原文传递
导出
摘要 最后通牒博弈是行为经济学中研究人类公平决策的常见范式之一。在最后通牒博弈中存在系统的个体差异和种族文化差异,其中个体差异还包括年龄差异、性别差异和心理特征差异。对这些差异进行研究,不仅有助于进一步检验和深化公平决策理论,还有益于相关理论的实践应用。未来的研究需要整合有关差异与理论解释,以及从脑结构与神经化学视角探究有关差异的神经机制。 The ultimatum game(UG) is a well-studied game used extensively by behavioral economists or psychologists to study people’s fair decision-making. In this game, two players are given an opportunity to split a sum of money. One player(i.e., the proposer) decides how to divide up the money between him- or herself and another player(i.e., the responder). If the responder accepts, the split takes place as proposed; however, if the responder rejects, neither of the two individuals receives any money. Game theory predicts that the proposer will offer the smallest amount and that the responder will accept it. However, once again, this prediction is at odds with observed behavior across a wide range of societies. With the rise of UG, the individual and cultural differences in UG enter into the eye of researchers gradually. Thus current paper gave a review of those differences. Based on this review, several suggestions regarding to the direction for future research were given. So far, the researches on age differences consistently showed an age-related change in UG. Specifically, some researches indicated that the older children and adolescents offered more than the younger groups as proposer. And the relationship between age and rejection was positive. Those findings were mostly explained with reference to theories of socialization and the development of the ability of impulse control. Then, in the gender differences the current results agreed on some findings: there was little overall difference in the average offers between men and women, while women were more likely to reject. The current studies attributed the gender differences to the contributions of cultural factors and biological differences between men and women. Next, there were fruitful researches about the differences of psychological characteristics. The first aspect was emotional control. The second aspect was Social Value Orientation. This paper also gave a review of cognition as well as personality. Finally, the experiments during the last 20 years demonstrated that decision-making might be heavily influenced by cultural differences. The behavior in the UG was systematically related to the continents in which the experiment was conducted. In details, the rejection in Asia was the highest, and participants in the East were more prone to fair outcomes. The UG results between agricultural society and industrial society were substantially different. And there was also a difference in the mixedrace groups.While recent studies have shed light on the existing differences in UG, less is known about the mechanism behind the behavioral differences. In order to get a full understanding of the UG, further research is expected to integrate existing findings and related theories. In addition, further research could link all sorts of differences to the specific biochemical or neural mechanism, which can contribute to a deeper understanding of the behavioral differences in UG at the level of molecular genetics and neuropsychology. How to improve the UG paradigm and how to deal with the money effect also have brought challenge and expectation for future researchers.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期693-699,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71571083)的资助
关键词 最后通牒博弈 年龄差异 性别差异 心理特征差异 种族文化差异 ultimatum game age differences gender differences the differences of psychological characteristics cultural differences
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1陈璟,孙昕怡,李红.儿童完全信息最后通牒博弈决策的发展[J].心理与行为研究,2012,10(2):104-114. 被引量:10
  • 2陈叶烽.最后通牒实验与人类的公平感[J].南方经济,2014,43(6):81-86. 被引量:6
  • 3王赟,吴斌,李纾,周媛.公平的神经基础[J].科技导报,2015,33(9):83-92. 被引量:5
  • 4杨天亮,辛斐,雷旭.人类大脑结构和功能的性别差异:来自脑成像研究的证据[J].心理科学进展,2015,23(4):571-581. 被引量:18
  • 5朱莉琪,皇甫刚,M.Keller,牟毅,陈单枝.从博弈游戏看儿童经济决策行为的发展[J].心理学报,2008,40(4):402-408. 被引量:27
  • 6Brafias-Garza, P., Espin, A. M., & Neuman, S. (2014). Religious pro-sociality? Experimental evidence from a sample of 766 Spaniards. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e104685.
  • 7BrandstS, tter, H., & KSnigstein, M. (2001). Personality influences on ultimatum bargaining decisions. European Journal of Pemonality, 15(S1), $53-$70.
  • 8Brevers, D., Nol, X., Ermer, E., Dabiri, D., Verhanek, P., & Komreich, C. (2013). Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: A preliminary study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 133(2), 772-775.
  • 9Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Johnson, E. J. (2004). When do fair beliefs influence bargaining behavior? Experimental bargaining in Japan and the United States. Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 181 - 190.
  • 10Chew, S. H., Ebstein, R. P., & Zhong, S. F. (2013). Sex-hormone genes and gender difference in ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from China and Israel. Journal of Eeanomlc Behavior and Organization, 90, 28-42.

二级参考文献240

共引文献58

同被引文献77

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部