期刊文献+

空间工作记忆负载对真实场景情境提示效应的影响 被引量:1

Effects of Spatial Working Memory Load on the Contextual Cueing in Real-World Scene Search
原文传递
导出
摘要 重复的画面布局能够促进观察者对目标项的搜索(情境提示效应)。本研究采用双任务范式,分别在视觉搜索任务的学习阶段(实验2a)和测验阶段(实验2b)加入空间工作记忆任务,并与单任务基线(实验1)进行比较,考察空间工作记忆负载对真实场景搜索中情境线索学习和情境提示效应表达的影响。结果发现:空间负载会增大学习阶段的情境提示效应量,同时削弱测验阶段的情境提示效应量,而不影响情境线索的外显提取。由此可见,真实场景中情境线索的学习和提示效应的表达均会受到有限的工作记忆资源的影响,但情境线索提取的外显性不变。。 Investigators have previously examined the effects of visuospatial working memory load on visual search using a dual-task paradigm in which participants performed a visual search task concurrently with either a spatial working memory(SWM) task or an object working memory(OWM) task. It has been found that the SWM load impairs the expression instead of learning from contextual cueing. In addition, the OWM load affected neither the learning nor the expression of contextual cueing. Meanwhile, some experiments have revealed that only the SWM load affected the search efficiency in traditional visual search and real-world scenes search. The present article extended traditional visual search to real-world scenes search and investigated how the SWM load affected the learning and expression of contextual cueing in real-world scenes using a dual-task paradigm.In the present study, the participants performed a single task or dual tasks. In the single task, participants were asked to search a specific target(" ┫ " or " ┣ ") from a series of displays, in which 50% of the displays were repeated and the other 50% of the displays were updated constantly in order to elicit the contextual cueing. In the dual tasks, participants were asked to perform a search task during the delay interval of spatial working memory task(remembering four spatial locations which were presented one by one). In Experiment 2a, sixteen participants performed dual tasks and a single task in the learning phase and the test phase separately. Conversely, in Experiment 2b, sixteen participants performed a single task and dual tasks in the learning phase and the test phase separately. However, in Experiment1, sixteen participants only performed the single task in both learning phase and test phase. Finally, we analyzed the results of each experiment and compared the standardized context cueing scores(CC) of Experiments 2a and 2b with that of Experiment 1 respectively.The main findings were as follows:(1) In Experiment 2a, the search advantage for repeated displays was observed in the presence of the concurrent spatial working memory load. This advantage was observed in both the learning and test phases. Compared with the non-loads condition in Experiment 1, the CC were higher in both the learning and test phases;(2) In Experiment 2b, the search advantage for repeated displays was only observed in the learning phase. The advantage disappeared in the presence of the concurrent spatial working memory load in the test phase. Compared with the non-loads condition in Experiment 1, the CC were only significant in the test phase, specifically the CC decreased, while it showed no difference in the learning phase.These findings suggest that the effects of spatial working memory load on the contextual cueing in search of real-world scenes are not the same as those in the traditional visual search. Spatial working memory load would improve the learning, but impair the expression of the contextual cueing in search of real-world scenes. In other words, the spatial working memory load affects the learning and the expression of contextual cuing simultaneously. Meanwhile, the current study also suggests that the spatial working memory load does not affect the nature of explicit learning of contextual cueing.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期534-540,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 山东省高等学校人文社会科学研究计划项目(J13WH07) 山东师范大学青年教师科研项目(人文社会科学类) 山东省"十二五"高校人类认知与行为发展重点实验室建设项目 山东省应用基础型名校工程(应用心理学)建设项目 山东省"十二五"特色重点学科(发展与教育心理学)建设项目的资助
关键词 空间工作记忆负载 情境提示效应 真实场景 spatial working memory load contextual cueing effect real-world scenes
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1任衍具,孙琪.视空工作记忆负载对真实场景搜索绩效的影响[J].心理学报,2014,46(11):1613-1627. 被引量:8
  • 2赵斐斐,任衍具.空间情境提示效应及其机制[J].心理科学进展,2013,21(7):1173-1185. 被引量:4
  • 3Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. In S. T. Fiske, D. L. S;hacter, & S. E. Taylor (Eds.), ArmuM Re'ew ofPsycbology ( pp. 1-29). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
  • 4Brockmole, J. R., Hambrick, D. Z., Windisch, D. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). The role of meaning in contextual cueing: Evidence from chess expertise. The Quarterly Journal of Expexlmental Psychology, 61 (12), 1886-1896.
  • 5Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cogrdgon, 13(1), 99-108.
  • 6Hollingworth, A. (2012). Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge. In M. D. Dodd, & J. H. Flowers (Eds.), The influence ofattenron, learning, and motivaron on visual search (pp. 63-89). New York: Springer.
  • 7Jiang, Y. H., & Leung, A. W. (2005). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychonomie Bulletin and Review, 12(1), 100-106.
  • 8Konkle, T., Brady, T. F., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2010). Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects. Janmal oExpedmentM Psycbology: General, 139(3), 558-578.
  • 9Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Ature, 390(6657), 279-281.
  • 10Manginelli, A. A., Gefingswald, F., & Pollmann, S. (2012). Visual search facilitation in repeated displays depends on visuospatial working memory. Experimental Psychology; 59(1), 47-54.

二级参考文献130

  • 1葛列众,王松琴,何灿群.背景线索效应的研究综述[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1451-1452. 被引量:6
  • 2Anderson, D. E., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2013). A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychological Science, 24(6), 929-938.
  • 3Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.
  • 4Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. In S. T. Fiske, D. L. Schacter, & S. E. Taylor (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 63, pp. 1-29). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
  • 5Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2009). The specificity of the search template. Journal of Vision, 9(1),34, doi:10.1167/9.1.34 Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2012). Task demands determine the specificity of the search template. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1),124-131.
  • 6Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4),699-706.
  • 7Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4),753-763.
  • 8Castelhano, M. S., & Heaven, C. (2010). The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1283-1297.
  • 9Castelhano, M. S., Pollatsek, A., & Cave, K. R. (2008). Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4),795-801.
  • 10Droll, J., & Eckstein, M. (2008). Expected object position of two hundred fifty observers predicts first fixations of seventy seven separate observers during search. Journal of Vision, 8(6),320, doi:iO.1167/8.6.320.

共引文献10

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部