摘要
目的分析比较连续性血液透析和间歇性血液透析治疗急性肾衰竭的临床疗效。方法整群选取于2011年1月—2014年1月来院治疗的急性肾衰竭患者56例作为研究对象,按治疗方法的不同,分为对照组(n=28例)和观察组(n=28例),对照组行间歇性血液透析治疗,观察组行连续性血液透析治疗,观察对比两组治疗效果。结果观察组治疗后的Scr、BUN水平优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组低血压发生次数、心律失常发生次数分别为(1.65±0.45)次、(1.21±0.35)次,低于对照组的(3.89±1.32)次、(3.67±1.63)次,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急性肾衰竭应用连续性血液透析治疗的临床效果显著,可改善Scr、BUN水平,减少并发症的发生,值得使用。
Objective To analyze and compare the clinical effects between continuous hemodialysis and intermittent hemodialysis in the treatment of acute renal failure. Methods 56 cases with acute renal failure treated in our hospital from January 2011 to January 2014 were selected as the subjects and divided into the control group（n=28） and the observation group（n=28） in accordance with the treatment method. The control group were treated by intermittent hemodialysis, and the observation group were treated by continuous hemodialysis. And the treatment effects of the two groups were observed and compared. Results After treatment, the Scr and BUN levels were better in the observation group than those in the control group（P〈0.05）. The frequency of hypotension was less in the observation group than that in the control group [（1.65 ±0.45）times vs（3.89±1.32） times]（P〈0.05）. The frequency of arrhythmia in the observation group was less in the observation group than that in the control group [（1.21±0.35） times vs（3.67±1.63） times]（P〈0.05）. Conclusion For acute renal failure, continuous hemodialysis can significantly improve the Scr and BUN levels and reduce the incidence of complications, which is worth using.
出处
《中外医疗》
2015年第36期20-21,24,共3页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
急性肾衰竭
连续性血液透析
间歇性血液透析
Acute renal failure
Continuous hemodialysis
Intermittent hemodialysis
