摘要
在１００多年前马克思提出的资本雇佣劳动的理论无疑是科学的。由此推出的剩余价值理论也是正确的。在今天来谈论资本及其收入时，需要结合发展了的实践来作出科学的回答。现实中资本有多种类型，各类资本的功能不同，因此并不是任何资本收入都是剥削收入。资本收入是否是剥削收入，这需要在对各类资本的作用及其收入进行具体分析的基础上作出科学的判断。马克思所定义的剥削收入与雇佣劳动相关，在这种关系中依靠资本所有权无偿占有剩余劳动，就是剥削。资本雇佣劳动所取得的收入可以定义为剥削收入；资本被其他要素所雇佣而取得的收入，就不能一概认定为剥削收入。这种分析，决无贬低和否认资本作用之意，而是旨在鼓励更多的资本进入经济过程。
The theory of capital hiring Labor is correct undoubtedly which was put forward by Marx more than one hundred years ago, and the surplus value theory is scientific also deduced from which. Now when we talk on capital and the payment for capital, we can't say they all belong to income from exploitation. Exploitation income has something to do with hired labor, when Capitalists have surplus products without paying for labors, it is exploitation. The payment for capital is exploitation income when capital hiring labor, while capital is hired by other factors, we should analyze the nature of reward to capital according to the concrete conditions. This kind of analysis doesn't deny the furction of capital, hut encourage more and more capital to enter productive process.
出处
《当代经济研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第1期3-5,共3页
Contemporary Economic Research
