期刊文献+

基于交互观的口语互动能力构念界定 被引量:22

An Interactionalist Approach to Conceptualizing the Construct of Interactional Speaking Competence
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统二语能力构念的界定着重从个体认知角度描述语言使用者内在的语言能力,但是随着学界越来越重视语言的社会属性和功能,不少学者提出构念定义应该更多考虑社会互动和语境对语言使用的影响。因此,本文提出基于交互构念理论构建口语互动能力构念描述框架的初步设想,旨在使口语测试更加充分地体现真实口语交际的特点和口语交际能力的本质。 Traditionally,second language( L2) construct has been defined mainly from an individual-focused cognitive perspective,portraying the abilities within an individual language user. As the social nature and functions of language receive growing attention among applied linguists,more and more researchers argue for a primarily social representation of the L2 construct,addressing the influence of social interaction and context on L2 use. Accordingly,this paper proposes to adopt an interactionalist approach to conceptualizing the construct of interactional speaking competence in an attempt to provide a better assessment of the ability to interact in real-life settings.
作者 张琳 金艳
机构地区 上海交通大学
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期103-108,共6页 Foreign Language Research
基金 教育部哲学社科研究重大课题攻关项目"中国英语能力等级量表建设研究"(15JZD049)的阶段性成果
关键词 测试构念 交互构念理论 口语互动能力 社会互动 test construct interactionalist construct theory interactional speaking competence social interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

二级参考文献65

  • 1桂诗春.语言测试:新技术与新理论[J].外语教学与研究,1989,21(3):2-10. 被引量:56
  • 2李清华.基于纸笔的语言测试与基于计算机的语言测试的等效研究综述[J].外语界,2006(4):73-78. 被引量:32
  • 3Nerlich,B.& Clarke.D.D.Cognitive Linguistics and the History of Linguistics[A].In Geeraerts,D.& Cuyckens,H.(eds.).The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics[C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2007.
  • 4Oliveira,Roberts Pires de & Robson de Scuza Bittencourt.An Interview with Mark Johnson and Tim Rohrer:From Neurons to Sociocultural Situatedness[A].In Roslyn M.Frank,Bené Dirven,Tom Ziemke,Enrique Bema' rdez and Mouton de(eds.).Body,Language and Mind.Volume 2:Sociocultural Situatedness[C].Berlin/New York:Waiter de Gruyter,2008.
  • 5Palmer,Gary B.Energy Through Fusion at Last:Synergies in Cognitive Anthropology and Cognitive Linguistics[A].In Gitte Kristiansen,et al.(eds.).Cognitive Linguistics:Current Applications and Future Perspectives[C].Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter,2006.
  • 6Rohrer,Tim.Three Dogmas of Embodiment:Cognitive Linguistics as a Cognitive Science[A].In Gitte Kristiansen,et al.(eds.).Cognitive Linguistics:Current Applications and Future Perspectives[C].Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter,2006.
  • 7Ruiz de Mendoza Ibá(n)ez,Francisco José,and Lorena Pérez Hernandez.Metonymy and the Grammar:Motivation,Constraints and Interaction[J].Language & Communication,2001 (4).
  • 8Grondelaers,Stefan,Dirk Speelman,& Dirk Geeraerts.Lexical Variation and Change[A].In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens(eds.).The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics[C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2007.
  • 9Grondelaers,Stefan,Marc Brysbaert,Dirk Speelman,& Dirk.Er als accessibility marker:on-en offline evidentievoor een procedurele interpretatie van presentatieve zinhen[J].Gramma,2002(9).
  • 10Johnson,Mark,& Tim Rohrer.We are Live Creatures:Embodiment,American Pragmatism and the Cognitive Organism[A].In Tom Ziemke,Jordan Zlatev & Roslyn M.Frank (eds.).Body,Language,and Mind.Volume 1,Embodiment[C].Berlin:Walter de Gruyter,2007.

共引文献472

同被引文献156

引证文献22

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部