建立新的国际政治结构理论被引量：7

A New Approach to the Structure in International Politics

导出

摘要美国国际关系理论学者近年来就国际体系结构的性质问题展开了激烈的辩论。这一辩论的出现标志着国际关系研究领域的积极发展。发起辩论的是国际关系理论的“建构主义转向”行列中的主要学者亚历山大·温特。本文向读者介绍了温特对结构问题的论述 ,并以这种方式具体阐述了他的结构理论。作者既指出了温特对理解国际体系结构所做的富有价值的贡献 ,也简单表述了现实主义者、自由主义者和其他建构主义者对温特理论的批评。本文还强调 ,研究建构主义理论对于非西方国际政治学者来说是非常重要的。 In recent years international relations theorists in the United States have become embroiled in a fierce debate over the nature of the structure of the international system. This essay contends that the emergence of such disagreement represents a positive development in the field and has been led by the efforts of those working within the constructivist research project. It substantiates such a claim through introducing the reader to the insights that Alexander Wendt, a leading figure in the“constructivist turn' in international relations, has made in his work on structural issues. While the essay argues that Wendt's contribution to our understanding of the structure of the international system is of great value, it also touches upon the main critiques that have been leveled against his work by realists, liberals, and other constructivists. The essay then concludes with an emphasis on the importance of a consideration of constructivism to those working on international politics outside the Western context.

作者艾伦.卡尔森秦亚青

机构地区美国康奈尔大学政治学系

出处《欧洲》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第3期19-25,共7页 Europe

关键词国际关系理论建构主义温特 International Relations Constructivism Wendt

分类号 D80 [政治法律—外交学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Jeffery Checkel, "The Construetivist Turn in Interrmtional Relatiom Theory," Worm Politics (1998), 50, pp. 324 -348.
2Wendt, "The Agent - Strueture Problem in International Relations Theory," P. 356.P. 356.P. 357.P. 350.
3Wendt, "Anarchy Is What States Make of It :The Social Construction of Power Politics," pp, 394 -395.P. 397.P. 399.P. 412.P.418
4John Mearsheimer, "The False Promise of International Institutions"International Security ( I994/1995) ,No. 19, pp. 5 - 49.
5Mearsheimer, "A Realist Reply," International Security (1995), 20,pp. 82-93.
6Mearshejmer, "A Realist Reply," P. 92.
7Wench, Social Theory of International Politics, P. 186. P. 188..P.188.pp, 260- 262. P. 298.
8Hedley Bull , The Anamhical Society ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1977).
9Roxanne Lynn Doty , "Aporia : A Critical Exploration of the Agent - Slrueture Problenmtique in International Relations Theory," European Journal of International Relations (1997),No. 3, pp. 365-392.
10Darel Paul, ""Sovereignly, Survival, and the Westphilian Blind Ally in International Relations," Review of Intentational Studies (1999),No, 25, pp. 217 -231.