期刊文献+

Effect of time bin size on accuracy of streak tube imaging lidar

Effect of time bin size on accuracy of streak tube imaging lidar
原文传递
导出
摘要 Streak tube imaging lidar (STIL) is an active imaging system that has a high range accuracy with tile use of a pulsed lapser transmitter and streak tube receiver to produce 3D range inlages. This work investigates the effect of tile time bin size oil the range accuracy of STIL systems based on the peak detection algorithm. The nunlerical simulation indicates that the time bin size has a significant effect on the range aceuracy, resulting in a modified analytical estimate of the range error. An indoor experilnent with a planar target is carried out to validate the theory that shows the linear relationship between tile range error and the time bin size. Finer 3D depth iinages of a fist model are acquired by using a smaller time bin size and the best range error of 0.003 In is achieved with the optimal time bin size of 0.07 ns. Streak tube imaging lidar (STIL) is an active imaging system that has a high range accuracy with tile use of a pulsed lapser transmitter and streak tube receiver to produce 3D range inlages. This work investigates the effect of tile time bin size oil the range accuracy of STIL systems based on the peak detection algorithm. The nunlerical simulation indicates that the time bin size has a significant effect on the range aceuracy, resulting in a modified analytical estimate of the range error. An indoor experilnent with a planar target is carried out to validate the theory that shows the linear relationship between tile range error and the time bin size. Finer 3D depth iinages of a fist model are acquired by using a smaller time bin size and the best range error of 0.003 In is achieved with the optimal time bin size of 0.07 ns.
出处 《Chinese Optics Letters》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2016年第2期19-22,共4页 中国光学快报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Projects of China under Grant No.2012YQ040164
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Z. Jiang and B. Guo, Appl. Opt. 53, 5985 (2014).
  • 2J. C. R. Bostater, T. Ghir, S. Naro-Norman, L. H. Huddleston, L. Bassetti, K. Mitra, C. Das, and A. Trivedi, Proc. SPIE 5233, 1(2004).
  • 3A. J. Nevis, R. J. Hilton, J. J. S. Taylor, B. Cordes, and J. W. McLean, Proc. SPIE 5089, 225 (2003).
  • 4R. T. Eagleton and S. F. James, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 2215 (2003).
  • 5A. D. Gleckler and A. Gelbart, Proc. SPIE 4377, 175 (2001).
  • 6J. W. McLean, Proc. SPIE 3761, 10 (1999).
  • 7A. D. Gleckler, A. Gelbart, and J. M. Bowden, Proc. SPIE 4377, 328 (2001).
  • 8A. Gelbart, B. C. Redman, R. S. Light, C. A. Schwartzlow, and A. J. Griffis, Proc. SPIE 4723, 9 (2002).
  • 9J. Liu, Q. Wang, S. Li, Y. Cheng, and J. Wei, Laser Phys. 19, 115(2009).
  • 10L. Wu, X. Wang, H. Yang, B. Yu, C. Chen, B. Yang, L. Yuan, L. Wu, Z. Xue, G. Li, and B. Wu, Appl. Opt. 51, 8836 (2012).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部