期刊文献+

胰体尾癌患者行扩大胰体尾切除术的可行性研究 被引量:3

Viability of extended distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body or tail
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨扩大胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾癌的可行性及其预后影响因素.方法 回顾性分析2011年1月至2014年12月四川大学华西医院收治的57例胰体尾癌患者资料,按照手术方式不同分为标准胰体尾切除组(n=35)和扩大胰体尾切除组(n=22).通过t检验、x2检验等对两种术式的安全性和生存预后进行比较,并对预后相关因素进行Cox回归分析.结果 与标准胰体尾切除组相比,扩大胰体尾切除组的手术时间长[(255±91) min比(208±80) min](t=2.066,P=0.044),输血率升高(50.0%比17.1%)(x2=12.836,P=0.008),但术中出血量和术后住院时间无差异(P值均>0.05).扩大胰体尾切除组胃排空延迟发生率更高(22.7%比2.9%)(Z=-2.251,P =0.027),但两组间并发症发生率、再手术率、病死率无差异(P值均>0.05).标准胰体尾切除组和扩大胰体尾切除组中位生存时间分别为13.1个月和8.2个月,两组生存比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).多因素分析结果显示,肿瘤大小(RR=1.275,P=0.03)和围手术期输血(RR=2.673,P=0.04)为独立预后因素.结论 虽然扩大胰体尾切除组患者的病理分期较晚,但经过扩大胰体尾切除,可取得与标准胰体尾切除组患者相当的生存获益.肿瘤大小和围手术期输血是影响胰体尾癌患者预后的独立因素. Objective To analyze the viability of extended distal pancreatectomy and the associated prognostic factors.Methods The data of 57 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent standard distal pancreatectomy (DP) or extended distal pancreatectomy (EDP) from January 2011 to December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively.Thirty-five patients were performed with DP and 22 with EDP.Operation safety and survival benefit between DP and EDP were compared by t-test or x2 test.Cox regression analysis was used to explore the prognostic indicators.Results Compared to DP group,operation time((255 ±91)min vs.(208 ±80)min)(t =2.066,P =0.044) and ratio of blood transfusion (50.0% vs.17.1%) (x2 =12.836,P =0.008) were greater in EDP group,respectively.There were no significant differences in amount of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative duration of hospitalization.Delayed gastric emptying was greater in EDP(22.7% vs.2.9%) (Z =-2.251,P =0.027),while other complications had no differences.Mortality and ratio of relaparotomy also showed no differences.Median survival following DP was 13.1 months compared to 8.2 months following EDP.There was no difference in survival between DP and EDP.According to the results of multivariate analysis,tumor size (RR =1.275,P =0.03) and perioperative blood transfusions(RR =2.673,P =0.04) were independent prognostic factors.Conclusions Though patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who undergo EDP have a worse pathologic staging,they will gain a comparable long-term survival to the patients undergo DP.Tumor size and perioperative blood transfusions are independent prognostic factors.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期201-205,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 胰腺肿瘤 胰腺切除术 扩大胰体尾切除术 预后 Pancreatic neoplasms Pancreatectomy Extended distal pancreatectomy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献46

  • 1胰腺癌诊治指南[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(19):1297-1299. 被引量:15
  • 2Finney JM. VII. Resection of the Pancreas: Report of a Case. Ann Surg 1910; 51:818-829.
  • 3LiUemoe KD, Kaushal S, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg 1999; 229:693-698.
  • 4Mayo WJ. I. The Surgery of the Pancreas: I. Injuries to the Pancreas in the Course of Operations on the Stomach. II. Injuries to the Pancreas in the Course of Operations on the Spleen. III. Resection of Half the Pancreas for Tumor. Ann Surg 1913; 58:145-150.
  • 5Soper NJ, Brunt LM, Dunnegan DL, Meininger TA. Lapa- roscopic distal pancreatectomy in the porcine model. Surg Endosc 1994; 8: 57-60; discussion 60-61.
  • 6Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: Is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1997; 1: 20-25; discussion 25-26.
  • 7Borja-Cacho D, A1-Refaie WB, Vickers SM, Tuttle TM, Jen- sen EH. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Am Coil Surg 2009; 209: 758-765; quiz 800.
  • 8Gumbs AA, Chouillard EK. Laparoscopic distal pancreatec- tomy and splenectomy for malignant tumors. J Gastrointest Cancer 2012; 43:83-86.
  • 9Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS, Bassi C, Delvaux G, Weerts J, Fabre JM, Boulez J, Baulieux J, Peix JL, Gigot JE. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 2005; 137:597-605.
  • 10Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associ- ated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2012; 255:1048-1059.

共引文献963

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部