期刊文献+

Ⅱ、Ⅲ期直肠癌术前与术后放化疗疗效比较的Meta分析 被引量:2

Comparison of preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ rectal cancer:a meta-analysis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的通过Meta分析比较术前与术后放化疗对Ⅱ、Ⅲ期直肠癌的疗效。方法检索2014年12月前发表的有关Ⅱ、Ⅲ期直肠癌术前与术后放化疗疗效比较的文献,纳入本研究的文献为随机对照试验(RCT),提取其短期及长期临床疗效指标进行分析。结果共包括1 642例直肠癌患者的5项RCT纳入本研究。术前放化疗组患者较术后放化疗组5年局部复发率低(OR=0.60,95%CI:0.41~0.88,P=0.008),两组5年远处转移率(OR=0.87,95%CI:0.67~1.11,P=0.26)、5年无病生存率(HR=0.84,95%CI:0.70~1.00,P=0.05)及总生存率(HR=0.90,95%CI:0.75~1.08,P=0.27)比较均无统计学差异,术前放化疗组毒性反应发生率较术后放化疗组低(OR=0.64,95%CI:0.50~0.82,P<0.01)。结论采用术前放化疗的患者较术后放化疗的患者对直肠癌复发及毒性反应发生风险小,但远处转移及远期预后无明显差别。 Objective To compare preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with postoperative CRT for patients with stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ rectal cancer through meta-analysis. Methods Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ebsco and Ovid Electronic database were searched and only randomized controlled trials for patients with resectable stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ rectal cancer were included. Results Five clinical trials involving 1642 patients were included in meta-analysis. The results revealed that preoperative CRT improved local control (OR=0.60, 95% CI:0.41-0.88, P=0.008) compared to postoperative CRT and it might benefit for disease free survival (DFS) (HR=0.84, 95% CI:0.70-1.00, P=0.05); whereas there were no significant differences in distant metastases rate (OR=0.87, 95% CI:0.67-1.11, P=0.26) and overall survival (OS)(HR=0.90, 95% CI:0.75-1.08, P=0.27) between two methods. Preoperative CRT was less toxicity than postoperative CRT (OR=0.64; 95% CI:0.50-0.82, P 〈0.01). Conclusion Preoperative chemoradiotherapy can reduce local recurrence rate with less toxicity compared to postoperative CRT.
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2016年第1期44-48,共5页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
基金 金华市科学技术研究计划项目(2014-3-010)
关键词 直肠癌 术前 术后 放化疗 Rectal cancer Preoperative Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Bernstein T E, Endreseth B H, Romundstad P, et al. Improved local control of rectal cancer reduces distant metastases[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14(10): e668-678.
  • 2NIH consensus conference. Adjuvant therapy for patients with colon and rectal cancer[J]. JAMA, 1990, 264(11): 1444-1450.
  • 3Sauer R, Fietkau R, Wittekind C, et al, Adjuvant vs. neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: the German trial CAO/ARO/AIO-94[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2003, 5(5): 406-415.
  • 4Bosset J F, Collette L, Calais G, et al, Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355 (11): 1114-1123.
  • 5Gerard J P, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(28): 4620-4625.
  • 6Ceelen W, Fierens K, Van Nieuwenhove Y, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage Ⅱand Ⅲresectable rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Cancer, 2009, 124(12): 2966-2972.
  • 7Latkauskas T, Paskauskas S, Dambrauskas Z, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation vs radiation alone for stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2010, 12(11): 1075-1083.
  • 8Parmar M K, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints[J]. Stat Med, 1998, 17(24): 2815-2834.
  • 9Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351(17): 1731-1740.
  • 10Taher A N, El-Baradie M M, Nasr A M, et al. Locally advanced rectal carcinoma: preoperative radiotherapy versus postoperative chemoradiation, 10-year follow-up results of a ranoomized clinical study[J]. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst, 2006, 18(3): 233-243.

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部