期刊文献+

城镇用地“经济—社会—生态”绩效空间分异与障碍诊断 被引量:23

SPATIAL DIFFERENTIATION AND HINDRANCE DIAGNOSIS OF URBAN LAND USE ECONOMIC-SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE
原文传递
导出
摘要 要:研究的目的在于揭示城镇用地"经济—社会—生态"绩效的空间分异与绩效障碍,并提出政策建议。研究以江苏省为研究区,基于经济、社会和生态统计数据,分别采用绩效评价模型和障碍度诊断模型对江苏省61个县域城镇用地进行绩效评价与障碍度诊断。研究发现,江苏省城镇用地综合绩效呈现出苏南最大、苏中次之、苏北最小的空间格局,经济、社会、生态绩效分别具有不同的空间分异特征。在主导障碍因素方面,苏南地区主导障碍因素是社会障碍因素,而苏中和苏北地区主导障碍因素是经济障碍因素。因此,面对江苏省县域城镇用地中存在的绩效障碍问题,需要减弱城镇用地绩效主导障碍、缩小地区内部县域城镇用地绩效差异、坚持"经济—社会—生态"绩效协调发展。 The purpose of this study is to analyze spatial differentiation and hindrance of urban land use based on the economic-social-ecological performance and advances counter-measures. Using the social, economic and ecological data of 61 counties in Jiangsu Province, we construct a land use performance evaluation model and a hindrance diagnosis model to analyze spatial differentiation and measure the hindrance degree. Our results show that the comprehensive performance of land use in Jiangsu Province presents a spatial pattern with a decreasing ranking of "Southern Jiangsu-Central Jiangsu-North Jiangsu", and the economic, social and ecological performance shows different spatial differentiation characteristics. The economic performance shows spatial characteristics with a decreasing ranking of "Southern Jiangsu - Central Jiangsu -Northern Jiangsu". Social performance does not show a significant differentiation state. Ecological performance shows a spatial pattern the same with that of economic performance. As for intra-regional spatial difference, the economic performance shows spatial characteristics with that "Southern Jiangsu is the largest, followed by Central Jiangsu and Northern Jiangsu". In terms of the social performance, there are significant spatial differences between Southern Jiangsu and Central Jiangsu, while the difference is trivial in the Northern Jiangsu. The ecological performance presents a pattern that Central Jiangsu is the best, followed by Southern Jiangsu and Northern Jiangsu respectively. The dominant hindrance factors of Southern Jiangsu are social factors, while in Central and North Jiangsu, the dominant factors are economic hindrance factors. With the hindrance problem of land use in Jiangsu, it is necessary to weaken dominant hindrance, improve the land use performance on county level, fill the gap between counties, and stick to the "social-economic-ecological" performance framework and the coordinated development.
出处 《人文地理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期94-101,共8页 Human Geography
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71303260) 江西省软科学项目(20112BAA10044)
关键词 城镇用地 绩效评价 障碍度诊断 空间分异 江苏省 urban land performance evaluation hindrance diagnosis spatial differentiation Jiangsu
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1陈士银,周飞,吴雪彪.基于绩效模型的区域土地利用可持续性评价[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(6):249-253. 被引量:42
  • 2张光宏,崔许锋.人口城镇化与城镇化用地关系研究——以江苏省为例[J].中国人口科学,2013(5):96-104. 被引量:9
  • 3约翰·冯·杜能.孤立国同农业和国民经济的关系[M].吴衡康,译.北京:商务印书馆,1986:1—551.
  • 4阿尔弗雷德·韦伯.工业区位论[M].李刚剑,陈志人,等译.北京:商务印书馆,2009:50.
  • 5沃尔特·克里斯塔勒.德国南部中心地原理[M].常正文,王兴中,等译.北京:商务印书馆,2010.
  • 6奥古斯特·勒施.经济空间秩序[M].王守札,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010:36-37.
  • 7Kalogirou S. Expert systems and GIS: An application of land suit- ability evaluation[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2002,26(2):89-112.
  • 8Li J, Lewis J, Rowland J, et al. Evaluation of land performance in Senegal using multi-temporal NDVI and rainfall series[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2004,59(3):463-480.
  • 9Pauleit S, Duhme F. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Plan- ning, 2000,52(1):1-20.
  • 10Van Niekerk A. A comparison of land unit delineation techniques for land evaluation in the Western Cape, South Africa[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010,27(3):937-945.

二级参考文献164

共引文献871

同被引文献359

引证文献23

二级引证文献195

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部