期刊文献+

按现行规范设计的Ⅷ度区RC框架结构的倒塌性能评估 被引量:5

Collapse Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures in Seismic-intensity-8 Zone Designed Using Current Codes
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 选取按照现行规范设计的既有建筑进行有限元建模,考虑地震动的不确定性对其进行大量增量动力分析(IDA),得到模型的IDA曲线簇。在此基础上对其进行地震需求概率分析和概率抗震能力分析,拟合得到结构的易损性曲线,据此对结构的倒塌概率进行定量评估,并比较基于非线性分析与性能评估软件PERFORM-3D的纤维模型和塑性铰模型的分析结果。结果表明:按照我国现行规范设计的钢筋混凝土(RC)框架结构,在预期的罕遇地震作用下倒塌概率较小,可满足"大震不倒"的要求;基于PERFORM-3D的截面纤维模型所得的RC框架结构,经非线性分析所得的倒塌概率相对保守,安全储备更高。 Performance-based seismic design theory has received considerable attention from scholars since its proposition in the 1990 s.Collapse evaluation is an important part of performance-based seismic design.In this respect,although current Chinese seismic design codes for building structures have particular requirements and analytical approaches are used to prevent building collapse,they do not provide a quantitative index for the collapse-resistant capacity.Therefore,the collapse-resistance performance of structural systems,the seismic fragility,and collapse capacity of a reinforced concrete(RC)frame structure were investigated based on incremental dynamic analysis.A five-story and three-bay reinforced concrete frame structure,which was designed based on the current Chinese codes,was selected as a study case to conduct a seismic fragility assessment and collapse evaluation.Considering the uncertainty of ground motion,a mass incremental dynamic analysis was conducted for an existing building based on the current codes.In the incremental dynamic analysis,the intensity of a single motion was increased according to a series of intensity measures,under which an elastic-plastic dynamic analysis was performed.The relationship between the engineering demand parameters and the intensity measures was thus obtained,and on the basis of incremental dynamic analysis curves,the seismic demand probability and seismic capacity were then established.Furthermore,collapse evaluation was quantitatively performed based on fragility curves,which enable an estimation of the possible damage to buildings that could occur during an earthquake and have important significance in the improvement of seismic capacity and disaster prevention mitigation work.Finally,a comparison was made between a fiber model and a plastic hinge model based on PERFORM-3D.The fragility curves provide a quantitative evaluation under a specific ground motion intensity,and results show that RC frames designed in accordance with the current code have a small collapse probability during a rare earthquake,and that they meet the requirements of a 3-level design.The fiber and plastic hinge models have similar performance at a low spectral acceleration of motion;however,differences between the two models were evident with an increase in the spectral acceleration.Based on the fiber model,a nonlinear simulation of the RC frame in a collapse evaluation was relatively conservative and had a higher safety margin compared to the plastic hinge model.Therefore,in consideration of efficient modeling,the fiber model provided by PERFORM-3Dis a better choice as compared to the plastic hinge model.
作者 梁丹 梁兴文
出处 《地震工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期1060-1065,1072,共7页 China Earthquake Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51278402 51078305) 长江学者和创新团队发展计划(PCSIRT)
关键词 框架结构 增量动力分析 易损性分析 倒塌性能评估 frame structure incremental dynamic analysis fragility analysis anti-collapse performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
  • 2FEMA P-695, Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors[S],Washington D C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2009.
  • 3Vamvatsikos D,Cornellc A.Incremental Dynamic Analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002,31 (3) : 491-514.
  • 4吕大刚,于晓辉,陈志恒.钢筋混凝土框架结构侧向倒塌地震易损性分析[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2011,43(6):1-5. 被引量:37
  • 5叶列平,马千里,缪志伟.结构抗震分析用地震动强度指标的研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2009,29(4):9-22. 被引量:136
  • 6Federal Emergency Management Agency. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-frame Buildings [R].Report No FEMA-350,SAC Joint Venture.Washington,D C : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 7Perform-3D Nonlinear Analysis and Performance for 3D Structures Components and Elements [R]. University Avenue, Berkeley, California, USA, Computers and Structures Inc, 2011:58.
  • 8郑山锁,田进,韩言召,徐强,孙乐斌.考虑锈蚀的钢结构地震易损性分析[J].地震工程学报,2014,36(1):1-6. 被引量:24
  • 9Shome N.Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures[D].Stanford : Stanford University, 1999.
  • 10石玉成,高晓明,谭明,卢育霞,马占虎,陈文凯.2013年岷县漳县6.6级地震灾害损失评估[J].地震工程学报,2013,35(4):717-723. 被引量:16

二级参考文献28

  • 1梁彩凤,侯文泰.碳钢、低合金钢16年大气暴露腐蚀研究[J].中国腐蚀与防护学报,2005,25(1):1-6. 被引量:115
  • 2郝敏,谢礼立,徐龙军.关于地震烈度物理标准研究的若干思考[J].地震学报,2005,27(2):230-234. 被引量:37
  • 3唐代远,陆新征,叶列平,等.柱轴压比对我国RC框架结构抗地震倒塌能力的影响[C]//第12届高层建筑抗震技术交流会论文集,2009:4-10.
  • 4BERTERO V V. Stength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments [ C ]//PISTER K S. Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics. Prentice-Hall : Englewood Cliffs, 1977 : 211-255.
  • 5Federal Emergency Management Agency. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings, FEMA350 [ R]. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 6ZAREIAN F. Simplified performance-based engineering [ D ]. San Francisco : Stanford 2006.
  • 7earthquake University, ZAREIAN F, KRAWINKLER H. Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2007, 36(13) : 1901-1914.
  • 8LIEL A B, HASELTON C B, DEIERLEIN G G, et al. Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings[J]. Structural Safety, 2009, 31(2) : 197 -211.
  • 9VAMVATSIKOS D, CORNELL C A. Incremental dynamic analysis [ J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 491 -514.
  • 10MCKENNA F, FENVES G L, SCO'IT M H. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation [ R ]. University of California at Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2008.

共引文献334

同被引文献81

引证文献5

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部