期刊文献+

3种检测艰难梭菌方法的临床应用评估 被引量:7

Clinical evaluation of three methods in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool
暂未订购
导出
摘要 本研究旨在对3种检测粪便样本中艰难梭菌的方法进行临床应用评估,为艰难梭菌的实验室检测提供参考。采用艰难梭菌毒素A/B(Clostridium difficile toxins A and B,CDAB)酶联免疫荧光检测法、环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖琼脂(cycloserin-cefoxitin-fructose agar,CCFA)常规培养法和显色培养法(chromID^(TM))同步检测粪便样本中的艰难梭菌,并对培养所得菌株进行tcdB基因扩增以验证其产毒性。以艰难梭菌培养联合tcdB基因扩增为参考方法,分别计算上述3种方法的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值等参数,分析其与参考方法的一致性。研究共收集临床粪便样本164份,参考方法检测结果为58份阳性,106份阴性。经统计分析,艰难梭菌毒素A/B法的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为51.7%、95.3%、85.7%和78.3%,CCFA常规培养法分别为72.4%、98.1%、95.5%和86.7%,而艰难梭菌显色培养法分别为94.8%、92.5%、87.3%和97.0%。3种方法中,艰难梭菌显色培养法与参考方法的一致性最高(Kappa=0.856)。采用该方法检测粪便样本中的艰难梭菌操作简便,成本经济,结果判断直观、准确,具有较好的临床应用价值。 This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance of three methods in the detection of Clostridium difficile(C.difficile)in stool samples.Clinical samples were subjected to enzyme-linked fluorescence assay for C.difficile toxins A and B(CDAB),conventional bacterial cultivation using cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar(CCFA)and cultivation by chromogenic C.difficile identification medium(chromIDTM),respectively.A combination of bacterial culture and amplification of the tcdB gene was selected as the standard reference method for the evaluation.A total of 164 clinical stool samples were collected,of which 58 had positive results by the reference method whilst the rest 106 were negative.The CDAB method showed a sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 51.7%,95.3%,85.7% and 78.3%,respectively,while the corresponding values of the CCFA method turned out to be 72.4%,98.1%,95.5% and 86.7%,respectively.The chromIDTM method gave corresponding values of 94.8%,92.5%,87.3% and 97.0%,respectively.Among the three methods,chromIDTM method had the best consistency with the reference method(Kappa=0.856).It is concluded that chromIDTMis a simple and cost-effective method for the detection of C.difficile in stool samples,which can present easy-to-judge results and has a preferable value in clinical application.
出处 《微生物与感染》 2016年第1期24-27,共4页 Journal of Microbes and Infections
基金 国家自然科学基金(81371873) 上海市科学技术委员会基础研究重大项目(12JC1406100)
关键词 艰难梭菌 检测方法 灵敏度 特异度 Clostridium difficile Detection method Sensitivity Specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Cristina ML, Spagnolo AM, Sartini M, Panatto D, Perdelli F. Clostridium difficile infections: an emerging problem in healthcare facilities [J/OL]. Rev Med Microbiol, 2012, 23 (4) : 67-75. http://journals, lww. com/revmedmicrobiol/ Abstract/2012/10000/Clostridium_difficile_infections_ an_ emerging. 2. aspx.
  • 2Burke KE, Lamont JT. Clostridium diffieile infection: a worldwide disease[J]. Gut Liver, 2014, 8(1) : 1-6.
  • 3Dong D, Zhang L, Chen X, Jiang C, Yu B, Wang X, Peng Y. Antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance mechanisms of clinical Clostridium difficile from a Chinese tertiary hospital [J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2013, 41(1) . 80-84.
  • 4Marian R, Petri WA Jr. Immune responses to Clostridium difficile infection [J]. Trends Mol IVied, 2012, 18 ( 11 ) . 658-666.
  • 5Di Bella S, Capone A, Musso M, Giannella M, Tarasi A, Johnson E, Taglietti F, Campoli C, PetrosiUo N. Clostridium difficile infection in the elderly [J]. Infez Med, 2013, 21(2) : 93-I02.
  • 6Voth DE, Ballard JD. Clostridium difficile toxins: mechanism of action and role in disease [J]. CIin Microbiol Rev, 2005, 18(2): 247-263.
  • 7Carter GP, Rood JI, Lyras D. The role of toxin A and toxin B in the virulence of Clostridium difficile [J]. Trends Microbiol, 2012, 20(1): 21-29.
  • 8章黎华,董丹凤,江岑,彭奕冰.院内感染艰难梭菌的毒素检测及核糖体分型研究[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2012,32(11):1436-1439. 被引量:15
  • 9Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC, Pepin J, Wilcox MH; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) [J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2010, 31(5): 431-455.
  • 10Swindells J, Brenwald N, Reading N, Oppenheim B. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for Clostridium difficile infection [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2010, 48(2): 606-608.

二级参考文献10

共引文献21

同被引文献51

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部