摘要
律师庭外言论对司法审判的影响越来越明显,在调和律师言论自由和司法审判公正的矛盾上,各国都进行了积极探索。比较分析美国、英国和德国对律师庭外言论的规制,基于我国现实和规范需要,有必要借鉴美国《职业行为示范规则》相关经验。具体路径:立法模式上将律师庭外言论规制规则在《律师法》中独立成章;规制原则上坚持限制与保护并举,以实质危险标准对律师庭外不当言论加以限制,以"安全港"条款对律师庭外正当言论予以保护;规范形式上采用概括规定加一般列举形式;对象范围上限定为正在或曾参与案件审判的律师或公民代理人;法律责任设计上"事前禁止"和"事后责任"并行。
Attorney extrajudicial speech has a more obvious impact on fair trial.Many countries have made explorations and attempts to deal with the conflicts between attorneys＇ freedom of expression and fair trial.Comparing the experiences of America,Britain and Germany,and considering the reality of China,it is necessary to learn from the model of America.The way is to set an independent chapter on attorney extrajudicial speech in＂Lawyers Law＂,to take a restriction and protection principle,to take a form of general provisions and list regulations,to restrict the object to attorneys who are participating or have participated trial of cases,and to take apre-prohibition and post-responsibility form.
出处
《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2016年第1期117-121,共5页
Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目:"媒体审判的心理学机制与法律规制"(CQDXWL-2013-067)
关键词
律师
庭外言论
公正审判
attorney
extrajudicial speech
fair trail
