摘要
由法学论证上升为一般论证的图尔敏模型,也适用于对论辩的分析。在逻辑的"应用转向"背景下,跳出形式逻辑对因明分析的局限,通过对因明三支论式所进行的图尔敏模型分析,可以充分显示因明的论辩逻辑特性及其不同于其他论辩的某些特性。因明三支论式缺乏图尔敏模型的反驳构件,在正当理由和支援方面具有一定限度的扩张。这种分析还可揭示出因明三支论式中喻依与宗前陈之间所具有的类比性质。
Toulmin model of argument,as a scheme of general argument,which developed from legalargument is more widely applicable to argumentation.In the context of 'Application Turn' of logic,thisthesis breaks through the limitation of the researches on Hetuvidyā by instruments of formal logic.Characteristics of the argumentative logic of Hetuvidyā are fully revealed and its differences from otherarguments are demonstrated through been dealt with tri-avayava by Toulmin Scheme.Rebuttals are absentand complexity discovered at warrant and backing in tri-avayava.Additionally,the analogical relationshipis convincingly revealed between udāharana and dharmin.
出处
《河南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第11期85-88,123,共4页
Henan Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(15BZX082)
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(13JJD7200018)
关键词
图尔敏模型
论辩
因明
三支论式
Toulmin Model
Argument
Hetuvidyā
Tri-avayava
