摘要
虽然我国的刑事诉讼模式出现了向混合式转型的趋势,当事人主义的某些理念与制度也开始在当前诉讼制度中有所体现,但这种转型并不彻底。从现实来看,我国仍只是在技术、设备等方面推行当事人主义的制度安排,控辩双方在举证能力与程序控制上仍然存在着天壤之别的差距,被诉方仍未掌握诉讼交易权、沉默权等当事人主义下的主要程序性权利。故只有赋予法官庭外调查权,才能改变当前控辩双方诉讼资源严重失衡的现状,使得权利保障的天平更大幅度地向被告一方倾斜,从而更好地保障被追诉者的合法权益。
Although the criminal procedure pattern trends to the hybrid style, some ideas and regulations of the parties are also reflected in the current litigation system. This transformation is not complete. From a practical point of view, the adversary system arrangement is implemented in technology and equipment, there still exists different gap in proof capability and program control between the prosecution and defense lawyers, and the defense has not yet master the rights of litigation and silence. So only the judge getting the investigation rights outside the court can change the current serious imbalance, and thus better guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of the defendants.
出处
《重庆电子工程职业学院学报》
2015年第6期55-62,共8页
Journal of Chongqing College of Electronic Engineering
关键词
庭外调查
当事人主义
职权主义
权利保障
庭前会议
investigation out of court
litigant
authority
rights protection
the pretrial conference
