期刊文献+

上颌中切牙间颌骨解剖形态的CBCT测量分析 被引量:5

Anthropometric analysis between the maxillary central incisors assessed by cone beam computed tomography
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:利用锥形束CT(cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)测量分析上颌中切牙区唇舌向牙槽骨量,为微种植体的安全植入提供参考。方法:选取80例患者的CBCT影像资料,用Dolphin 11.0进行三维重建,测量鼻腭管前壁至上颌牙槽前壁的距离,以及上颌中切牙间矢状面在距离参考平面14.0 mm、16.0 mm、18.0 mm、20.0 mm四个植入高度处唇舌向骨质厚度。结果:鼻腭管前壁至牙槽前壁的距离,从下向上依次为(7.98±1.24)mm、(8.27±1.44)mm、(10.31±2.00)mm,逐渐增大,有显著性差异(P<0.05);不同植入高度间唇舌向骨质厚度无显著性差异(P>0.05);各高度组唇舌向骨质厚度均为男性大于女性(P<0.05)。结论:上颌中切牙间植入长度为6 mm的微种植体是安全的,可避免微种植体进入鼻腭管。 Objective: The primary aim of this study was to measure the buccolingual alveolar bone thickness between the maxillary central incisors by CBCT,providing reference for the safe miniscrew placement. Methods: The cone beam computed tomography images of80 patients were used. For each subject,the distance between the anterior nasopalatine canal and maxillary anterior buccal bone were measured. Besides,the buccolingual alveolar bone thickness on the median sagittal plane were measured at four different levels of 14. 0,16. 0,18. 0 and 20. 0 mm from the reference plane. Results: Distance between the anterior nasopalatine canal and maxillary anterior buccal bone were( 7. 98 ± 1. 24) mm,( 8. 27 ± 1. 44) mm,( 10. 31 ± 2. 00) mm. It increased from the oral cavity to the nasal cavity,and had significant difference. The buccolingual alveolar bone thickness has no significant difference at four different levels. Male has greater bone thickness than female at every level. Conclusions: The miniscrew with 6 mm length in the bone is safe to be placed. It is safe to implant miniscrews of 6 mm length between the maxillary central incisors,which will avoid the nasoplatine canal injury.
作者 许远 赵春洋
出处 《口腔生物医学》 2015年第4期215-218,共4页 Oral Biomedicine
基金 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(2014-37)
关键词 鼻腭管 唇舌向测量 上颌中切牙 微种植体 锥形束CT Nasopalatine Canal Buccolingual Measurement Maxillary central incisor Miniscrews Cone beam computed tomography
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage [ J ]. J Clin Orthod, 1997,31 ( 11 ) :763-767.
  • 2Kim SH, Yoon HG, Choi YS, et al. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area fur orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ,2009,135 (5) :635-641.
  • 3Nishimura M, Sannohe M. Nonextraction treatment with temporary skeletal anchorage devices to correct a Class Ⅱ Division 2 maloc- clusion with excessive gingival display[ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofa- cial Orthop,2014,145 ( 1 ) : 85-94.
  • 4Deguchi T,Murakami T,Kuroda S,et al. Comparison of the intru-sion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2008, 133 (5) :654-660.
  • 5Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomo- graphy[J]. Angle Orthod,2010,80(5) :939-951.
  • 6Ohnishi H,Yagi T,Yasuda Y,et al. A mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage in a deep overbite case [ J]. Angle Orthod, 2005,75 (3) :444-452.
  • 7Rodriguez JC. Implants for orthodontic anchorage:success rates and reasons of failoures [ J ]. Implant Dent, 2014,23 (2) : 155 -161.
  • 8Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, Liang X, et al. Neurovaseularization of the anterior jaw bones revisited using high-resolution magnetic reso- nance imaging[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radial Endod ,2007,103 ( 5 ) :683-693.
  • 9Liang X, Jacobs R, Martens W, et al. Macro-and micro-anatomi- cal,histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal [ J ]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009,36 ( 7 ) : 598 -603.
  • 10Filippi A, Pohl Y, Tekin U. Sensory disorders after separation of the nasopalatine nerve during removal of palatal displaced ca- nines :prospective investigation [ J ]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999,37 (2) : 134-136.

二级参考文献27

  • 1丁士海.颅骨某些角度的测量计算法[J].人类学学报,1983,2(4):390-395. 被引量:3
  • 2张玉玮,卢建慧.上颌第一双尖牙的牙体测量及其临床意义[J].天津医科大学学报,1996,2(1):76-77. 被引量:6
  • 3王惠芸.我国人牙的测量和统计[J].中华口腔科杂志,1959,7(3):149-149.
  • 4Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Moerman P, et al. Presence and course of the incisive canal in the human mandibular interforaminal region: twokdimensional imaging versus anatomical observations. Surg Radiol Anat, 2003,25(5) :416-423.
  • 5Winslow CP, Chan KH, Strain JD. Imaging quiz case 2. Patent nasopalatine duct. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1998, 124 (11) :1275, 1277-1278.
  • 6Rodrigues MT, Munhoz EA, Cardoso CL, et al. Unilateral patent nasopalatine duct : a case report and review of the literature. Am J Otolaryngol, 2009,30(2) : 137-140.
  • 7Mraiwa N, Jaeobs R, Van Cleynenbreugel J, et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2004,33(6) :396-402.
  • 8Abrahams JJ. Dental CT imaging: a look at the jaw. Radiology, 2001,219(2) :334-345.
  • 9Lomasney I.M, Steinberg MJ. Computerized imaging before patients undergo dental implantation. AIR Am J Roentgenol, 1999, 174(5) : 1439-1446.
  • 10Jacob R, Mraiwa N, Steenberghe D, et al. Appearance, location, course and morphology of the mandibular incisive canal: an assessment on spiral CT scan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2002,31 (5) :322- 327.

共引文献43

同被引文献22

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部