期刊文献+

早期积极降压对急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓患者早期再灌注及转归的影响 被引量:8

Effects of early intensive blood pressure lowering on early reperfusion and outcome after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨积极降压与指南推荐的标准血压控制对缺血性卒中患者静脉重组组织型纤溶原酶激活剂(recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, rtPA)溶栓后早期再灌注及转归的影响。 方法前瞻性纳入50例收缩压在150~185 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)之间并接受rtPA静脉溶栓治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者,随机分为积极降压组和指南降压组,每组25例。积极降压组在60 min内将血压降至收缩压140~150 mmHg并至少维持72 h);指南降压组按指南推荐将收缩压降至目标值〈180 mmHg。在溶栓前和溶栓后24 h进行多模式MRI检查。主要终点指标为90 d改良Rankin量表(modified Rankin Scale, mRS)评分及90 d病死率,次要终点指标为缺血脑组织早期再灌注率、血管再通率以及有症状颅内出血发生率。 结果两组人口统计学和基线资料均无统计学差异。积极降压组溶栓后24 h、48 h和72 h内的收缩压水平均显著低于指南降压组,而舒张压则无统计学差异。积极降压组90 d转归良好率(mRS评分0~2分:68%对64%;χ2=0.089,P=0.765)、病死率(4%对12%;χ2=1.087,P=0.297)、有症状颅内出血发生率(4%对8%;χ2=0.355,P=0.552)以及溶栓治疗后的再灌注率(76%对68%;χ2=0.397,P=0.529)和血管再通率(56%对52%;χ2=0.081,P=0.777)与指南降压组差异均无统计学。 结论急性缺血性卒中rtPA静脉溶栓患者急性期积极降压对再灌注无不利影响,也不会增高死亡或残疾风险。 ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of intensive antihypertensive treatment and guideline-recommended standard blood pressure control on early reperfusion and outcomes after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. MethodsA total of 50 patients with acute ischemic stroke (systolic blood pressure, 150-185 mmHg; 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and received intravenous rtPA therapy were enrolled prospectively. They were randomly divided into either a intensive antihypertensive treatment group or a guideline antihypertensive treatment group. In the the intensive antihypertensive treatment group, systolic blood pressure was decreased to 140-150 mmHg in 60 min for at least 72 h. In the guideline antihypertensive treatment group, systolic blood pressure was decreased to the target value 〈180 mmHg according to the guideline recommendation. Multi-mode MRI was completed at 24 h before and after thrombolysis. The primary endpoints were the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at day 90 and the mortality at day 90; the secondary endpoints were the early reperfusion rate in ischemic brain tissue, recanalization rate, and incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. ResultsThere was no significant difference in demographics and baseline data between the 2 groups. Within 24, 48, and 72 h after thrombolysis the mean systolic blood pressure in the intensive antihypertensive treatment group was significantly lower than those in the guideline antihypertensive treatment group, while there was no significant difference in diastolic blood pressure. There were no significant differences in favorable outcome rate at day 90 (mRS score 0-2: 68% vs. 64%; χ2=0.089, P=0.765), mortality (4% vs. 12%; χ2=1.087, P=0.297), incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (4% vs. 8%; χ2=0.355, P=0.552), reperfusion rate after thrombolysis (76% vs. 68%; χ2=0.397, P=0.529), and recanalization rate (56% vs. 52%; χ2=0.081, P=0.777) between the intensive antihypertensive treatment group and the guideline antihypertensive treatment group. ConclusionsEarly intensive antihypertensive treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke received intravenous rtPA thrombolysis does not have adverse effect on reperfusion rate, and does not increase the risk of death or disability either.
出处 《国际脑血管病杂志》 2015年第10期740-745,共6页 International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
基金 基金项目:江苏省卫生厅面上项目(1/201438) 南京市科技计划项目(201402046)
关键词 卒中 脑缺血 血栓溶解疗法 组织型纤溶酶原激活物 高血压 血压 抗高血压药 治疗结果 时间因素 Stroke Brain Ischemia Thrombolytic Therapy Tissue Plasminogen Activator Hypertension Blood Pressure Antihypertensive Agents Treatment Outcome Time Factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1中国缺血性脑卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作二级预防指南2010[J].中华神经科杂志,2010,43(2):154-160. 被引量:955
  • 2JauchEC, SaverJL, AdamsHP, et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44: 870–947.
  • 3GeeganageCM, BathPM. Relationship between therapeutic changes in blood pressure and outcomes in acute stroke: a metaregression[J]. Hypertension, 2009, 54: 775–781.
  • 4HebertPR, GazianoJM, ChanKS, et al. Cholesterol lowering with statin drugs, risk of stroke, and total mortality. An overview of randomized trials[J]. JAMA, 1997, 278: 313–321.
  • 5Ní ChróinínD, CallalyEL, DugganJ, et al. Association between acute statin therapy, survival, and improved functional outcome after ischemic stroke: the North Dublin Population Stroke Study[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42: 1021–1029.
  • 6DavisSM, DonnanGA, ParsonsMW, et al; EPITHET investigators. Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2008, 7: 299–309.
  • 7PedrazaS, SilvaY, MendezJ, et al. Comparison of preperfusion and postperfusion magnetic resonance angiography in acute stroke[J]. Stroke, 2004, 35: 2105–2110.
  • 8楼敏,严余清,陈智才,孙建忠,胡海涛,吴继敏.灌注加权成像-弥散加权成像不匹配与缺血性卒中静脉溶栓后早期再灌注的相关性[J].中华神经科杂志,2012,45(7):471-477. 被引量:23
  • 9TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings[J]. N Engl J Med, 1985, 312: 932–936.
  • 10IST-3 collaborative group, SandercockP, WardlawJM, LindleyRI, et al. The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the third international stroke trial [IST-3]): a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379: 2352–2363.

二级参考文献53

  • 1胡大一,张鹤萍,孙艺红,姜立清.华法林与阿司匹林预防非瓣膜性心房颤动患者血栓栓塞的随机对照研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(4):295-298. 被引量:163
  • 2Lonn E,Yusuf S,Arnold MJ,菅鑫妍.血管疾病中叶酸和B族维生素的使用不能降低高半胱氨酸浓度[J].中国处方药,2006,5(6):23-24. 被引量:136
  • 3中国成人血脂异常防治指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(5):390-419. 被引量:5227
  • 4Paciaroni M, Caso V, Agaelli G. The concept of ischemic penumbra in acute stroke and therapeutic opporttmities. Eur Neurol, 2009, 61 : 321-330.
  • 5Zaro-Weber O, Moeller-Hartmann W, Heiss WD, et al. Maps of time to maximum and time to peak for mismatch definition in clinical stroke studies validated with positron en~ssion tomography. Stroke, 2010, 41: 2817-2821.
  • 6Ofivot JM, Albers GW. Using advanced MRI techniques for patient selection before acute stroke therapy. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2010, 12: 230-239.
  • 7Gonen KA, Simsek MM. Diffusion weighted imaging and estima- tion of prognosis using apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in ischemic stroke. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 76: 157-161.
  • 8Wechsler LR. Imaging evaluation of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke, 2011, 42(1 Suppl): S12-S15.
  • 9Parikh V, Lee J, Shin W, et al. qCBF: a comparison of the accuracy between the bookend technique, empirical reference values and [O15]-H2O PET in rnoyamoya patients. Proceedings 17th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2009). Honolulu, 2009: 3262.
  • 10Shah MK, Shin W, Parikh VS, et al. Quantitative cerebral MR perfusion imaging: pree results in stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010, 32: 796-802.

共引文献980

同被引文献63

引证文献8

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部