摘要
《合同法》第97条后段中"采取其他补救措施"的规定内容模糊。可比照功能类同的《合同法》第58条中"折价补偿"的规定对其进行体系解释。折价补偿的具体数额原则上应为合同约定的价额,例外时为客观价值。得利丧失抗辩在双务合同中的限制不宜采差额说或因果关系说。比较对待给付返还说与财产上决定说,后者既可彰显返还中意思自治、后果自担的真义,又可逻辑一致地解决实践问题,涤除不必要的例外,在理论贯通性和价值判断妥适性上均较对待给付返还说略高一筹,是更佳的解释框架。在此基础上形成的规则,可作为解释第97条后段中"采取其他补救措施"的合理依据。
According to Article 97 of the Contract Law in China, one party may demand the other party to restore such party to its original state or adopt other remedial measures, if the contract is termi- nated and has been performed. The exact meaning of ＂other remedial measures＂ is not so clear. This pro- vision could be interpreted systematically referring to Article 58 of the Chinese Contract Law.In princi- ple, the amount of compensation should be settled by the price under the contract, otherwise it should be decided by the market price. The defense of change of position （Wegfall der Bereicherung） under the re- ciprocal contract should not be confined by the ＂Saldo＂ theory or causation. Compared with the theory of ＂Gegenleistungskondiktion＂, the theory of ＂VermOgensmal^ige Entscheidung＂ is a better doctrine, be- cause it is based on the private autonomy and provides a more logical and appropriate solution to the com- pensation in the restitution without unnecessary exceptions. The rules based on the theory of ＂VermogensmaBige Entscheidung＂ could apply to interpret ＂adopt other remedial measures＂ in the second half of Article 97 of the Chinese Contract Law.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期1171-1196,共26页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
"上海高校青年教师培养资助计划"(项目编号:ZZHZ13021)的资助
关键词
双务合同
解除
不当得利
差额说
对待给付返还说
财产上决定说
Reciprocal Contract
Termination of Contract
Unjust Enrichment＂Saldo＂ Theory
Theory of ＂Gegenleistungskondiktion＂
Theory of ＂VermogensmaBige Entscheidung＂
