期刊文献+

对比分析进水基质浓度对乙醇型和丁酸型发酵制氢系统的影响 被引量:1

Comparison of impact of influent substrate concentration on fermentative hydrogen production by ethanol-type and butyric-type fermentation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以糖蜜废水为基质,将两套厌氧接触式发酵制氢反应器(ACR)出水pH分别控制在4.5~5.0、5.5~6.0的水平,通过逐级提升进水COD浓度方式,系统对比分析基质浓度对乙醇型和丁酸型发酵制氢系统的影响。结果显示,对于乙醇型发酵制氢系统而言,当HRT=6 h,进水COD从5000逐步提升至12000 mg·L-1时,反应器的产氢效能逐步得到增强,但当COD进一步提升至15000 mg·L-1时,底物反馈抑制作用开始显现,因而在进水COD为12000 mg·L-1时,ACR产氢性能最佳,系统的产氢速率、污泥比产氢速率和单位基质氢气转化率分别为68.8 L·d-1、744.5 ml H2·(g VSS·d)-1、2.3 mol H2·(mol葡萄糖)-1。对于丁酸型发酵制氢系统而言,当HRT=8h,在进水COD从5000提升至20000 mg·L-1过程中,ACR产氢效能总体呈下降趋势,在进水COD为5000mg·L-1时,系统的污泥比产氢速率和单位基质氢气转化率最大,分别为159.6 ml H2·(g VSS·d)-1、1.0 mol H2·(mol葡萄糖)-1。研究结果表明,在进水COD为500~20000 mg·L-1的运行中,ACR乙醇型发酵系统的产氢效能优于丁酸型发酵制氢系统。 In the present study, the anaerobic contact reactor(ACR) was used to produce hydrogen from diluted molasses by anaerobic fermentation, and an ethanol-type fermentation and butyric-type fermentation were established by keeping the effluent pH of the two reactors at 4.5—5.0 and 5.5—6.0, respectively. And then the comparison of the impact of influent substrate concentration on the performance of the above two reactors was investigated. For the ethanol-type fermentation system, the fermentative hydrogen-producing efficiency was enhanced when the influent chemical oxygen demanding(COD) was increased from 5000 to 12000 mg·L-1 under the HRT of 6 h, whereas, the feedback inhibition was turn to be functioned as the influent COD was increased to 15000 mg·L-1. It was found that the hydrogen production rate(HPR), specific hydrogen rate of sludge(SHPR) and hydrogen yield(HY) was peaked at 68.8 L·d-1, 744.5 ml H2·(g VSS·d)-1 and 2.3 mol H2·(mol glucose)-1, respectively, when the influent COD was 12000 mg·L-1. For the butyric-type fermentation system, the hydrogen producing efficiency was decreased on the whole as the influent COD was increased from 5000 to 20000 mg·L-1 under the HRT of 8 h. It also showed that the maximum value of SHPR and HY was 159.6 ml H2·(g VSS·d)-1and 1.0 mol H2·(mol glucose)-1, respectively, when the influent COD was 5000 mg·L-1. It indicated that the hydrogen-producting capability of ethanol-type fermentation was better than that of butyric-type fermentation.
作者 昌盛 刘枫
出处 《化工学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期5111-5118,共8页 CIESC Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51508539 51178316) 国家水体污染控制与治理重大专项(2014ZX07405-001)~~
关键词 厌氧接触式反应器 进水基质浓度 化学需氧量(COD) 发酵制氢 发酵类型 anaerobic contact reactor(ACR) influent substrate concentration chemical oxygen demanding(COD) fermentative hydrogen production fermentation type
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Lee H S, Rittmann B E. Evaluation of metabolism using stoichiometry in fermentative biohydrogen [J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2009, 102 (3): 749-758.
  • 2Ren N Q, Chua H, Chan S Y, Tsang Y F, Wang Y J, Sin N. Assessing optimal fermentation type for bio-hydrogen production in continuous- flow acidogenic reactors [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98 (9): 1774-1780.
  • 3Ren Nanqi, Li Jianzheng, Li Baikun, Wang Yong, Liu Shirui. Biohydrogen production from molasses by anaerobic fermentation with a pilot-scale bioreactor system [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31 (15): 2147-2157.
  • 4Chang Sheng (昌盛). Operation control and capability of fermentative hydrogen production of anaerobic contact reactor[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012.
  • 5昌盛,李建政,付青,赵兴茹,郑国臣.ACR在不同进水COD浓度下的产氢性能与菌群结构[J].化工学报,2015,66(3):1156-1162. 被引量:4
  • 6Ramachandran U, Wrana N, Cicek N, et al. Hydrogen production and end-product synthesis patterns by Clostridium termitidis strain CT1112 in batch fermentation cultures with cellobiose or alpha-cellulose [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33 (23): 7006-7012.
  • 7Bakonyi P, Nemestóthy N, Simon V, Bélafi-Bakó K. Review on the start-up experiences of continuous fermentative hydrogen producing bioreactors [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 40: 806-813.
  • 8Hung C H, Chang Y T, Chang Y J. Roles of microorganisms other than Clostridium and Enterobacter in anaerobic fermentative biohydrogen production systems: a review [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102 (18): 8437-8444.
  • 9Li H Z, Li B K, Zhu G F, et al. Hydrogen production from diluted molasses by anaerobic hydrogen producing bacteria in an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32 (15): 3274-3283.
  • 10Xing D F, Ren N Q, Li Q B. Ethanoligenens harbinense gen. nov., sp nov., isolated from molasses wastewater [J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2006, 56 (4): 755-760.

二级参考文献4

共引文献3

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部