摘要
比较优势理论自李嘉图提出之后便成为解释国际贸易的基础性理论之一。与李嘉图不同,赫克歇尔-俄林模型用要素禀赋差异来构建比较优势理论。由于各国的要素禀赋存在着重大差异,要素禀赋理论成为理解贸易模式的重要理论基础,并被一些学者视为具有一般性的发展战略,比如林毅夫以要素禀赋理论为基础构建了新结构经济学框架。本文认为,对于一个发展中大国来说,新结构经济学框架中有关要素禀赋结构的核心概念过于粗糙,关于"新古典"政府动力和能力的问题存在着逻辑不一致性,同时忽视了历史因素对产业结构变迁的影响,因此,新结构经济学难以成为发展中国家,尤其是发展中大国制定发展战略的理论基础。
The theory of Comparative Advantage was first put forward by David Ricardo, after that it became the explanatory basis of international trade. Differing from Ricardo, Heckscher-Ohlin model developed theory of Comparative Advantage with factor endowment, for the difference existing between factor endowments among countries, Factor Endowment Theory became the new theoretical foundation of trade and was treated as useful development strategies. For example, Professor Lin Yi-Fu constructs the frame of New Structural Economics （NSE） with F-E theory. This paper argues that for a developing country such as China, NSE is not a good theoretical basis for formulating development strategy for： its key concept ＂factor endowment structure＂ is too crude, and it contains a logical inconsistency relating the ability and incentives of government, and the ignorance of the effects of historical elements on the structural change should also be considered a shortcoming.
出处
《工业经济论坛》
2015年第6期1-8,共8页
Industrial Economy Review
关键词
新结构经济学
要素禀赋
要素禀赋理论
New Structural Economics
factor endowment
factor endowment theory.
