摘要
文章利用检察院腐败立案数量的省级数据和东亚民主调查数据,比较了中国腐败主观测量结果和客观测量结果,发现二者在各省的得分和排名上存在差异性。文章分别检验了腐败打击规模和要案处理比例对腐败主客观测量结果差异性的影响。结果发现,扩大腐败打击规模和"抓要案"均可以显著降低主观测量结果,而后者的作用要小于前者,且容易受到公众关注政治新闻频率的影响。这一结论对于反腐败策略的选择具有政策含义。
Based on provincial procuratorates＇ anti -corruption data and the East Asia Barometer survey data, this study compares the subjective measurement results and objective measurement results of corruption in Chi- na, finding the difference of provincial performance between these two results. Statistic results indicate that the anti- corruption strategies have various effects on the provincial difference between objective and subjective measurement results. Specifically, both the strategies of ＂increasing detection certainty＂ and ＂focusing on im- portant cases＂ can reduce the subjective corruption measurement results. However, the latter＇s contribution is smaller than the former＇s, and is affected by the mass media.
出处
《经济社会体制比较》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期66-80,共15页
Comparative Economic & Social Systems
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目"全面加强惩治和预防腐败体系建设:战略
路径与对策研究"(项目编号:13&ZD011)
高校基本科研业务费中山大学青年教师培育项目(项目编号:13wkpy73)
关键词
腐败
主观测量
客观测量
差异
反腐败策略
Corruption
Subjective or Objective Measurement
Difference
Anti - corruption Strategy
