亲子权利冲突中的利益平衡原则——以欧洲人权法院判例为中心被引量：12

Balancing Approach in the Conflict between the Rights of Parents and Child: Focus on the Case Law of the ECtHR

下载PDF

导出

摘要儿童权利和利益的独立化是亲子权利冲突的逻辑前提。欧洲人权法院的司法实践表明,对于儿童最大利益原则的理解不应当绝对化。无论是家庭生活范畴的界定,还是对法律依据和其目的的审查,抑或是对民主社会之所需标准的判断,都必须将利益平衡原则作为基础。儿童利益只是利益平衡中所需要考虑的一项重要因素,并不会当然地处于权利位阶的上层。在具体的案件中,利益平衡原则提供了更为透明的司法推理,克服了儿童最大利益原则所面临的模糊性困境。 The independence of children’ s rights and interests constitutes the logic premise of confliction between children and parents.The case law of the European Court of Human Rights shows that the interpreta-tion and application of the best interests principle should not be absolute.No matter in the process of defining the conception of family life, reviewing the legal bases and their corresponding aims, or scrutinizing the neces-sity of democratic society, the balancing exercise is of crucial importance.Children’ s interests are just only one of the factors that should be taken into account.That’ s to say, its priority is not automatic.In given ca-ses, the balance of interests principle offers a much more transparent reasoning and averts the vagueness prob-lem enshrined in the welfare principle.

作者刘征峰

机构地区中国政法大学民商经济法学院

出处《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期35-44,共10页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基金教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地(国家人权教育与培训基地)项目"以保障儿童人权为导向建构国家监护制度研究"(14JJD820017) 中国--瑞典互换奖学金项目(Swedish Institute Reference No.19120/2014)

关键词儿童最大利益原则利益平衡原则比例性原则亲子关系欧洲人权法院 best Interests of children interests balancing principle proportionality parenthood ECtHR

分类号 DF982 [政治法律—国际法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献106

1Shazia Choudhry and Jonathan Herring.European Human Rights and Family Law,Oxford:Hart Publishing,2010.
2(德)迪特尔·施瓦布.《德国家庭法》,王葆莳译,北京:法律出版社2010年版.
3Merris Amos.Human Rights Law,Oxford:Hart Publishing,2014.
4Jacqueline Rubellin-Devichi.“The Best Interests Principle in French Law and Practice”,International Journal of Law and the Family,1994,(8).
5刘征峰、杨狄.《论现代家庭法中的事实亲子关系》,载解志勇.《法大研究生》,北京:中国政法大学出版社2014年版.
6Robert H.Mnookin.“Child-Custody Adjudication:Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy”,Law and Contemporary Problems,1975,(39).
7Mary Ann Glendon.“Fixed Rules and Discretion in Contemporary Family Law and Succession Law”,TULANE Law Review,1986,(60).
8Sonia Harris-Short.“Family Law and the Human Rights Act 1998:Judicial Restraint or Revolution?”,Child and Family Law Quarterly,2005,(17).
9Michael Freeman.Article 3:The Best Interests of the Child,Leiden:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2007.
10Ann Quennerstedt.“Balancing the Rights of the Child and the Rights of Parents in the Convention on the Rights of the Child”,Journal of Human Rights,2009,(8:2).