摘要
目的研究分析宫颈糜烂患者的临床治疗方式,为临床治疗提供参考。方法 2013~2014年我院共接收了78例宫颈糜烂患者,将其分组为实验组和对照组,实验组共有45例患者接受利普刀治疗,对照组33例患者接受微波疗法,对两组的临床治疗效果进行分析。结果实验组患者的治疗有效率为93.33%,不良反应的发生率为2.2%,对照组患者的治疗有效率为75.76%,不良反应的发生率为18.2%,治疗效果和不良反应的发生率差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论宫颈糜烂患者接受利普刀的治疗效果比较好,患者的临床症状改善明显,疗效显著。
ObjectiveTo study the clinical treatment in patients with cervical erosion,provide the reference for the clinical treatment.MethodsFrom 2013 to 2014 in our hospital received a total of 78 cases of cervical erosion patients,grouping them into experimental group and control group,the experimental group had a total of 45 patients underwent LEEP treatment,the control group of 33 patients received microwave therapy,and the clinical effects of two groups were analyzed.Results The effective rate of the treatment of the patients in the experimental group was 93.33%,the incidence rate of adverse reactions was 2.2%,the effective rate of the control for 75.76% patients in the treatment group,the incidence rate of adverse reactions was 18.2%,the curative effect and adverse reaction rate significantly,with statistical significance（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Cervical erosion patients accepted LEEP treatment effect is better,the clinical symptoms of the patients improved obviously,obvious curative effect.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2015年第8期149-150,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
宫颈糜烂
利普刀治疗
治疗效果
Cervical erosion
LEEP therapy
Therapeutics effect
