期刊文献+

连续护理模式联合健康教育在肾癌切除术患者中的应用 被引量:3

Application of continuous nursing intervention combined with health education on kidney cancer patients after radical resection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨连续护理模式联合健康教育在肾癌切除术患者中的应用。方法选择2013年1月至2014年12月间收治的行肾癌切除术患者123例,按照随机数字表法分为观察组(n=62)和对照组(n=61)。观察组患者进行连续护理模式联合健康教育,对照组患者进行常规护理干预。对两组患者干预前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、依从性及生活质量进行比较。结果观察组患者干预后SAS评分和SDS评分明显低于干预前,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);观察组患者SDS评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的服药、健康教育及出院复诊依从性均明显高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。观察组患者干预后的适应性评分及生活质量评分均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对行肾癌切除术患者实施连续护理模式联合健康教育,可明显减轻患者负性情绪,提高依从性和生活质量,值得临床推广。 Objective To investigate the application of continuous nursing intervention combined with health education on kidney cancer patients after radical resection. Methods From January 2013 to December 2014,totally 123 kidney cancer patients after radical resection were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into the observation group( n = 62) and the control group( n = 61). The patients in the observation group accepted continuous nursing intervention combined with health education and those in the control group accepted routine care. Self-rating anxiety scale( SAS) scores,self-rating depression scale( SDS) scores,treatment compliance and quality of life after intervention of patients between the two groups were compared. Results After intervention,SAS and SDS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than before intervention and the control group,with significant differences( P〈0. 05). After intervention,medication compliance,exercise compliance and hospital referral compliance of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group,with significant differences( P〈0. 05). Adaptability scores and the quality of life scores of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group,with significant differences( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Continuous nursing intervention combined with health education for kidney cancer patients after radical resection can effectively relieve negative emotions,enhance treatment compliance and quality of life.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2015年第9期1106-1108,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 肾肿瘤 连续护理干预 健康教育 生活质量 Kidney neoplasms Continuous nursing intervention Health education Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献37

  • 1胡清,何文芳,苏泽轩,丁泓文.偶发性肾癌的临床分析[J].广东医学,2004,25(7):747-749. 被引量:1
  • 2马潞林,赵磊,黄毅,肖春雷,卢剑.后腹腔镜下与开放式两种肾癌根治术的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2004,19(8):454-455. 被引量:38
  • 3张旭,李宏召,马鑫,郑涛,徐晓峰,郭小林,陈忠,王少刚,叶章群.后腹腔镜保留肾脏手术治疗肾肿瘤[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):160-162. 被引量:72
  • 4黄毅彬,陈仕平.偶发性肾癌诊治进展[J].海南医学,2006,17(12):133-135. 被引量:2
  • 5Klipfel J, Jacobson T M, Havel M. Radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy: implications for post - operativenursing care [J ]. Urol Nurs, 2010, 30 (6) : 347.
  • 6Bourdeanu L, Twardowski P, Pal S K. Nursing considera- tions with pazopanib therapy: focus on metastatic renal cell carcinoma[J]. Clin J Oncol Nuts, 2011, 15(5) : 513.
  • 7Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg,Panagiotis Kallidonis,Narasimhan Ragavan,Anja Dietel,Minh Do,Phuc Ho Thi,Holger Till,Evangelos N. Liatsikos.Clinical outcomes of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy[J].World Journal of Urology.2012(5)
  • 8Takatsugu Okegawa,Naoshi Itaya,Hidehiko Hara,Kikuo Nutahara,Eiji Higashihara.Initial operative experience of single‐port retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy[J].International Journal of Urology.2012(8)
  • 9ANDREW J. PORTIS,YAN YAN,JAIME LANDMAN,CATHY CHEN,PETER H. BARRETT,DONALD D. FENTIE,YOSHINARI ONO,ELSPETH M. McDOUGALL,RALPH V. CLAYMAN.LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY[J].The Journal of Urology.2002(3)
  • 10顾秀芳.外科非急诊入院手术286例术前健康教育需求调查分析及对策[J].齐鲁护理杂志(下半月刊)(外科护理),2008,14(5):18-18. 被引量:4

共引文献50

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部