期刊文献+

盐芥和拟南芥在不同胁迫下生理及ABA受体基因的响应 被引量:4

Responses of Physiological Mechanism and ABA Receptor Genes in Thellungiella halophila and Arabidopsis thaliana under Different Stress
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以盐生植物盐芥和甜土植物拟南芥为实验对象,利用生物信息学手段分析两者ABA受体的进化关系和保守结构域,比较和研究了盐芥和拟南芥在400 mmol·L-1甘露醇、200 mmol·L-1 Na Cl和50μmol·L-1 ABA处理下的根生长,相对含水量和渗透压等生理指标的差异及ABA受体基因在胁迫条件下的表达变化。结果表明,在盐和干旱胁迫条件下,盐芥根的伸长率和侧根数目显著高于拟南芥,表明前者抗逆性较强。ABA受体基因的表达在两者之间存在差异,PYL4、PYL5、PYL6、PYL7和PYL9在两者中表达变化趋势一致,PYR1、PYL1、PYL10和PYL13在盐芥和拟南芥中表达趋势相反,结合生理指标推测两者在ABA信号途径中可能存在差异。 Thellungiella halophila and Arabidopsis thaliana were adopted as materials in this study. The evolutionary relationship and conserved domains of ABA receptors were analyzed by bioinformatics tools. We compared the differences between T. halophila and Arabidopsis in root growth, RWC, osmotic pressure and the expression of ABA receptor genes under 400 mmol·L^-1 mannitol, 200 mmol·L^-1 Na Cl and 50 μmol·L^-1 ABA stress conditions, respectively. The results showed that T. halophila had higher root elongation and more lateral roots under salt and drought stress treatment, which revealed that T. halophila was more tolerant to abiotic stresses than Arabidopsis. Under the same treatment, the expression pattern of ABA receptors showed the difference between these two species. The expression of PYL4, PYL5, PYL6, PYL7 and PYL9 showed the same trend, while the expression of PYR1, PYL1, PYL10 and PYL13 had the opposite trend, which indicated that there may be some differences in ABA signaling pathway between T. halophila and Arabidopsis.
出处 《植物生理学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第8期1248-1256,共9页 Plant Physiology Journal
基金 山东省科技计划项目(2012GGB01136) 山东大学高校自主创新项目(201303050)
关键词 盐芥 拟南芥 ABA受体 盐胁迫 干旱胁迫 Thellungiella halophila Arabidopsis thaliana ABA receptors salt stress drought stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1邓凤飞,杨双龙,龚明.外源ABA对低温胁迫下小桐子幼苗脯氨酸积累及其代谢途径的影响[J].植物生理学报,2015,51(2):221-226. 被引量:25
  • 2李竹青,娄文华,石步根.溶液渗透压单位的探讨[J].化学分析计量,2009,18(5):69-71. 被引量:4
  • 3尚铁(2010).拟南芥ABA受体ABAR/CHLH调控的一个ABA信号通路[博士位论文].北京:清华大学.
  • 4易文凯,王佳,杨辉,田云,卢向阳.植物ABA受体及其介导的信号转导通路[J].植物学报,2012,47(5):515-524. 被引量:23
  • 5张瓒,王萃铂,房伟民,陈发棣,蒋甲福,管志勇,陈素梅.ABA喷施提高菊花抗蚜性及其生理机理[J].植物生理学报,2014,50(12):1857-1862. 被引量:7
  • 6Chen CW, Yang YW, Lur HS, Tsai YG, Chang MC (2006). A novel function of abscisic acid in the regulation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) root growth and development. Plant Cell Physiol, 47:1-13.
  • 7De Smet I, Signora L, Beeckman T, Inz6 D, Foyer CH, Zhang H (2003). An abscisic acid-sensitive checkpoint in lateral root de- velopment of Arabidopsis. Plant J, 33 (3): 543-555.
  • 8Fujii H, Chinnusamy V, Rodrigues A, Rubio S, Antoni R, Park SY, Cutler SR, Sheen J, Rodriguez PL, Zhu JK (2009). In vitro re- constitution of an abscisic acid signalling pathway. Nature, 462 (7273): 660-664.
  • 9Gonzalez-Guzman M, Pizzio GA, Antoni R, Vera-Sirera F, Merilo E, Bassel GW, Fernandez MA, Holdsworth MJ, Perez-Amador MA, Kollist H et al (2012). Arabidopsis PYR/PYL/RCAR re- ceptors play a major role in quantitative regulation of stomatal aperture and transcriptional response to abscisic acid. Plant Cell, 24:2483-2496.
  • 10Inan G, Zhang Q, Li P, Wang Z, Cao Z, Zhang H, Zhang C, Quist TM, Goodwin SM, Zhu Jet al (2004). Salt cress. A halophyte and cryophyte Arabidopsis relative model system and its applicabil- ity to molecular genetic analyses of growth and development ofextremophiles. Plant Physiol, 135 (3): 1718-1737.

二级参考文献95

共引文献54

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部