期刊文献+

论法益判断法——一罪是行为犯或结果犯的判断标准

The Method of Legal Interest Judgment——The Judgmental Standard of Conduct Crime or Result Crime
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 判断一罪是行为犯还是结果犯,具备理论与实务双重意义。从行为犯与结果犯之区别的通说中,可以提炼出一个重大启示:行为犯的行为本身必将侵害法益或有侵害法益的危险,无需通过结果来体现,但结果犯的行为本身无法体现侵害法益或有侵害法益的危险,必须通过结果或具体危险来体现。由此可创设法益判断法,以三个步骤来判断一罪是行为犯还是结果犯。 To decide whether a crime is the conduct crime or result crime has both theoretical and practical significance. There can be concluded an important hint from the common theory of the difference between conduct crime and result crime. The hint is that the conduct of conduct crime must harm legal interest or have the danger of harming legal interest and conduct crime consequently doesn't need the result to embody them. Meanwhile, the conduct of result crime can not embody legal interest 's being harmed or the danger of harming legal interest, and the result crime must need result or concrete danger to embody them. By this can we create the method of legal interest judgment which can use three steps to decide whether a crime is conduct crime or result crime.
作者 王德政
机构地区 四川大学法学院
出处 《重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第4期90-97,共8页 Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 法益判断法 行为犯 结果犯 method of legal interest judgment conduct crime result crime
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1克劳斯·罗克辛.德国刑法学(总论)[M].王世洲译,北京:法律出版社,2005.
  • 2汉斯·海因里希·耶赛克 托马斯·魏根特 徐久生译.德国刑法教科书(总论)[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001.208.
  • 3冈特·施特拉腾韦特,洛塔尔·库伦:刑法总论Ⅰ-犯罪论[M].杨萌,译.北京:法律出版社,2006:311.
  • 4曲新久.刑法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2006.
  • 5林山田.刑法各罪论(上册)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011:255.
  • 6高铭暄,马克昌.刑法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,201l:49.
  • 7林山田.刑法通论(下册)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
  • 8德国刑法典[M].徐久生,庄敬华,译.北京:中国方正出版社,2004.
  • 9张明楷.日本刑法典[M].北京:法律出版社2006:12.
  • 10西田典之.日本刑法各论[M].刘明祥,王昭武,译.北京:法律出版社,2013:71.

共引文献181

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部