期刊文献+

应用德尔菲法构建健康学校评价指标体系 被引量:5

Application of the Delphi method in developing healthy school index system
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用德尔菲法构建健康学校建设评价指标体系,为采用有效手段推动健康学校建设提供参考依据。方法通过头脑风暴法和专题讨论,形成指标体系框架;通过2轮专家咨询、层次分析法计算评估体系中各级指标权重,确定健康学校建设评价指标体系。结果 15名专家参与德尔菲咨询,2轮均收回15份有效资料。专家权威系数为0.825,2轮指标的变异系数均<0.30;一级指标和二级指标的专家协调系数分别为0.540和0.597,专家协调系数均有统计学意义(P值均<0.01)。初步确定的健康学校建设评价指标体系由4个一级指标,8个二级指标和35个三级指标组成。结论初步建立较完备的健康学校建设评价指标体系。该体系结构稳定,专家意见比较协调,涵盖健康学校建设的主要因素。 Objective To construct a scientific index system for school health evaluation and promotion. Methods Item pool was developed through brainstorming and seminar. Delphi expert consultation was used to determine evaluation index system. Results After two rounds consultation with 15 experts, the authority coefficient was 0. 825. Variation of the two coefficients was less than 30% , the coordination coefficient of primary and secondary indexes was 0. 540 and 0. 597, respectively. The healthy school system was preliminarily identified as four primary indices, eight secondary indices and 35 third indieies. Conclusion Evaluation index system of school health is well-developed. Structure is scientific, applicable and feasible, covering important aspects of school health system.
出处 《中国学校卫生》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第5期752-754,共3页 Chinese Journal of School Health
基金 杭州市医学重点专科专病项目(20120533Q03)
关键词 德尔菲技术 健康素养 质量指标 卫生保健 Delphi technique Health literacy Quality indicators, health care
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献133

共引文献114

同被引文献60

  • 1何敏.健康校园建设与学校健康教育[J].健康教育与健康促进,2010,5(2):142-144. 被引量:1
  • 2侯家祥,李连花.台湾学校健康教育与健康促进发展现况[J].中国学校卫生,2003,24(6):680-681. 被引量:2
  • 3李俊勇,刘民,周丽.医学科研项目全程评价指标体系的建立[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2005,18(1):33-36. 被引量:117
  • 4汪金鹏,江启成.安徽省小康社会居民健康素质评价指标体系研究[J].卫生软科学,2006,20(2):122-125. 被引量:5
  • 5Australian Research Council. ERA 2010 National Report [EB/OL]. [2015 -05 -20]. http: //www. arc. gov. au / pdf/ERA_ report, pdf.
  • 6QANU. STANDARD EVALUATION PROTOCOL (SEP) 2009 -2015 [ EB/OL]. [2015 -04 - 14]. http: //www. qanu. nl/en/standard - evaluation - protocol.
  • 7Clarke A, Dawson R. Evaluation research: an introduction to principles, methods and practice [ M ]. London : Sage, 1999.
  • 8Okoli C, Pawlowski S D. The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: an example, design considerations and applications [J]. Information& Management, 2004, 42 (1): 15-29.
  • 9Saaty T L. Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process [ J ]. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008, 1 (1): 83-98.
  • 10Legendre P. Species Associations: the Kendall coefficient of Concordance revisited [ J]. Journal of Agricultural, Biologi- cal, and Environmental Statistics, 2005, 10 (2) : 226 -245.

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部