期刊文献+

Analysis and Evaluation of the Global Aerosol Optical Properties Simulated by an Online Aerosol-coupled Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model 被引量:3

Analysis and Evaluation of the Global Aerosol Optical Properties Simulated by an Online Aerosol-coupled Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Aerosol optical properties are simulated using the Spectral Radiation Transport Model I~)r Aerosol Species (SPRINTARS) coupled with the Non-hydrostatic ICosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM). The 3-year global mean all-sky aerosol optical thickness (AOT) at 550 nm, theAngstr/Sm Exponent (AE) based on AOTs at 440 and 870 nm, and the single scattering albedo (SSA) at 550 nm are estimated at 0.123, 0.657 and 0.944, respectively. For each aerosol species, the mean AOT is within the range of the AeroCom models. Both the modeled all-sky and clear-sky results are compared with observations from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). The simulated spatiotemporal distributions of all-sky AOTs can generally reproduce the MODIS retrievals, and the correlation and model skill can be slightly improved using the clear-sky results over most land regions. The differences between clear-sky and all-sky AOTs are larger over polluted regions. Compared with observations from AERONET, the modeled and observed all-sky AOTs and AEs are generally in reasonable agreement, whereas the SSA variation is not well captured. Although the spatiotemporal distributions of all-sky and clear-sky results are similar, the clear-sky results are generally better correlated with the observations. The clear-sky AOT and SSA are generally lower than the all-sky results, especially in those regions where the aerosol chemical composition is contributed to mostly by sulfate aerosol. The modeled clear-sky AE is larger than the all-sky AE over those regions dominated by hydrophilic aerosol, while the'opposite is found over regions dominated by hydrophobic aerosol. Aerosol optical properties are simulated using the Spectral Radiation Transport Model I~)r Aerosol Species (SPRINTARS) coupled with the Non-hydrostatic ICosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM). The 3-year global mean all-sky aerosol optical thickness (AOT) at 550 nm, theAngstr/Sm Exponent (AE) based on AOTs at 440 and 870 nm, and the single scattering albedo (SSA) at 550 nm are estimated at 0.123, 0.657 and 0.944, respectively. For each aerosol species, the mean AOT is within the range of the AeroCom models. Both the modeled all-sky and clear-sky results are compared with observations from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). The simulated spatiotemporal distributions of all-sky AOTs can generally reproduce the MODIS retrievals, and the correlation and model skill can be slightly improved using the clear-sky results over most land regions. The differences between clear-sky and all-sky AOTs are larger over polluted regions. Compared with observations from AERONET, the modeled and observed all-sky AOTs and AEs are generally in reasonable agreement, whereas the SSA variation is not well captured. Although the spatiotemporal distributions of all-sky and clear-sky results are similar, the clear-sky results are generally better correlated with the observations. The clear-sky AOT and SSA are generally lower than the all-sky results, especially in those regions where the aerosol chemical composition is contributed to mostly by sulfate aerosol. The modeled clear-sky AE is larger than the all-sky AE over those regions dominated by hydrophilic aerosol, while the'opposite is found over regions dominated by hydrophobic aerosol.
出处 《Advances in Atmospheric Sciences》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第6期743-758,共16页 大气科学进展(英文版)
基金 National Natural Science Funds of China (Grant Nos. 41130104, and 41475031) Open Research Program of Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration from Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (Grant No. KDW1302) the Public Meteorology Special Foundation of MOST (Grant No. GYHY201406023) the National Key Basic Research and Development Program (973 Program, 2011CB403401) Teruyuki NAKAJIMA is supported by projects from JAXA/EarthC ARE, MEXT/VL for Climate System Diagnostics the MOE/Global Environment Research Fund A-1101, NIES/GOSAT, NIES/CGER, MEXT/RECCA/SALSA the S-12 of the MOE
关键词 aerosol optical properties non-hydrostatic icosahedral atmospheric model Moderate Resolution Imaging Spec-troradiometer Aerosol Robotic Network aerosol optical properties, non-hydrostatic icosahedral atmospheric model, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spec-troradiometer, Aerosol Robotic Network
  • 相关文献

参考文献72

  • 1Acker, J. G., and G. Leptoukh, 2007: Online analysis enhances use of NASA Earth science data. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 88(2), 14-17.
  • 2Ackerman, S. A., K. I. Strabala, W. P. Menzel, R. A. Frey, C. C. Moeller, and L. E. Gumley, 1998: Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS. J. Geophys. Res., 103(D24), 32141-32157.
  • 3Adams, P. J., and J. H. Seinfeld, 2002: Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 107(D19), AAC 4-1-AAC 4-23.
  • 4Arakawa, A., and W. H. Schubert, 1974: Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the Large-Scale environment, Part I. J. Atmos. Sci., 31(3), 674--701.
  • 5Barnes, W. L., T. S. Pagano, and V. V. Salomonson, 1998: Prelaunch characteristics of the Moderate Resolution Imag- ing Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on EOS-AM1. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 36(4), 1088-1100.
  • 6Bi, J. R., J. P. Huang, Q. Fu, X. Wang, J. S. Shi, W. Zhang, H. W. Huang, and B. D. Zhang, 2011: Toward characterization of the aerosol optical properties over Loess Plateau of North- western China. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Ra- diative Transfer, 112(2), 346-360.
  • 7Chand, D., and Coauthors, 2012: Aerosol optical depth in- crease in partly cloudy conditions. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 117(D17), D17207, doi: I0.1029/2012JD017894.
  • 8Chin, M., and Coauthors, 2002: Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements. J. Atmos. Sci., 59(3), 461-483.
  • 9Chin, M., T. Diehl, O. Dubovik, T. E Eck, B. N. Holben, A. Sinyuk, and D. G. Streets. 2009: Light absorption by pol- lution, dust, and biomass burning aerosols: A global model study and evaluation with AERONET measurements. Ann. Geophys., 27, 3439-3464.
  • 10Chin, M., and Coauthors, 2014: Multi-decadal aerosol variations from 1980 to 2009: A perspective from observations anda global model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(7), 3657-3690.

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部