期刊文献+

面向高光谱图像分类的半监督丛流形学习 被引量:11

Semi-supervised bundle manifold learning for hyperspectral image classification
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 考虑高光谱遥感数据集多类别非线性的特点,本文假设高光谱遥感数据集具有丛流形结构属性,提出了一种半监督丛流形学习(SSBML)算法来有效提取高光谱遥感图像的鉴别特征。该算法利用标记样本和无标记样本构建两个近邻关系图来保持数据集中丛流形的"整体"结构(各个子流形之间的相互关系)和每个子流形的内蕴结构特征,实现半监督的丛流形学习。在肯尼迪航天中心(KSC)和帕维亚大学(PaviaU)高光谱数据集上的实验结果表明:该算法可以发现高光谱遥感数据集中丛流形结构的精细特征,有效提升高光谱遥感图像的分类精度。实验显示:该算法的总体分类精度比单一流形假设的局部保形投影(LPP)和邻域保持嵌入(NPE)算法提升了约2.9%~15.7%,比半监督最大边界准则(SSMMC)和半监督流形保持嵌入(SSSMPE)等半监督算法提升了约2.6%~12.4%。 On the basis of multi-class and nonlinear characteristics of hyperspectral remote sensing image database,this paper assumes that hyperspectral remote sensing database have a bundle manifold structure property and proposes a Semi-supervised Bundle Manifold Learning(SSBML)algorithm to effectively extract the discriminant characteristics of hyperspectral remote sensing image.The algorithm uses labeled samples and unlabeled samples to construct two neighborhood graphs to maintain a"whole"structure(the relationship between the various sub-manifolds)of bundle manifold in the data set and the intrinsic structure characteristics in each sub-manifold.By which,it achievessemi-supervised bundle manifold learning.The experimental results on Kennedy Space Center(KSC)and PaviaU hyperspectral database show that the algorithm efficiently discovers the subtle characteristics of the bundle manifold structure in hyperspectral remote sensing database,and enhances the classification accuracy of hyperspectral remote sensing images. For the overall classification accuracy,this algorithm is improved by 2.9%—15.7% as compared with those of Locality Preserving Projection(LPP)and Neighborhood Preserving Embedding(NPE)algorithm based on single-manifold assumptions,and increased by 2.6%—12.4%as compared with those of the SemiSupervised Maximum Margin Criterion(SSMMC)and the Semi-Supervised Sub-Manifold Preserving Embedding(SSSMPE)based on semi-supervised algorithms.
出处 《光学精密工程》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期1434-1442,共9页 Optics and Precision Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.61101168 No.41371338) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(No.2012M511906 No.2013T60837) 重庆市基础与前沿研究计划资助项目(No.cstc2013jcyjA40005) 重庆市博士后科研资金特别资助项目(No.XM2012001) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(No.1061120131204 No.106112013CDJZR125501)
关键词 高光谱遥感图像 鉴别特征 丛流形结构 半监督丛流形学习 hyperspectral remote sensing image discriminant characteristics bundle manifoldstructure Semi-supervised Bundle Manifold Learning(SSBML)
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1杜博,张乐飞,张良培,胡文斌.高光谱图像降维的判别流形学习方法[J].光子学报,2013,42(3):320-325. 被引量:13
  • 2陈宏达,普晗晔,王斌,张立明.基于图像欧氏距离的高光谱图像流形降维算法[J].红外与毫米波学报,2013,32(5):450-455. 被引量:20
  • 3宋相法,焦李成.基于稀疏表示及光谱信息的高光谱遥感图像分类[J].电子与信息学报,2012,34(2):268-272. 被引量:72
  • 4黄鸿,曲焕鹏.基于半监督稀疏鉴别嵌入的高光谱遥感影像分类[J].光学精密工程,2014,22(2):434-442. 被引量:14
  • 5ABDI H, WILLIAMS L J. Principal component analysis [J].Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2010, 2(4): 433-459.
  • 6MOULIN C, LARGERON C, DUCOTTET C, et al. Fisher linear discriminant analysis for text-image combination in multimedia information retrieval [J]. Pattern Recognition, 2014, 47(1): 260-269.
  • 7WAN M, LAI Z, JIN Z. Feature extraction using two-dimensional local graph embedding based on maximum margin criterion [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2011, 217(23): 9659-9668.
  • 8ROSMAN G, BRONSTEIN M M, BRONSTEIN A M, et al. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by topologically constrained isometric embedding[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2010, 89(1): 56-68.
  • 9ZHAO X, ZHANG S. Facial expression recognition using local binary patterns and discriminant kernel locally linear embedding [J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2012, 2012(1): 1-9.
  • 10LUO W. Face recognition based on Laplacian Eigenmaps [C].Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Service System (CSSS), Nanjing, China, 2011: 416-419.

二级参考文献69

  • 1苏红军,杜培军,盛业华.一种基于分形维数的高光谱遥感波段选择算法研究[J].测绘通报,2007(3):23-26. 被引量:10
  • 2Chan J C W and Paelinckx D. Evaluation of random forest and adaboost tree-based ensemble classification and spectral band selection for ecotope mapping using airborne hyperspectral imagery[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112(6): 2999-3011.
  • 3Shahshahani B M and Landgrebe D A. The effect of unlabeled samples in reducing the small sample size problem and mitigating the hughes phenomenon[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1994, 32(5) 1087-1095.
  • 4Breiman L. Random forests [J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32.
  • 5Wright J, Ma Y, Mairal J, et al. Sparse representations for computer vision and pattern recognition [J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2010, 98(6): 1031-1044.
  • 6Raina R, Battle A, Lee H, et al. Self-taught learning: transfer learning from unlabeled data[C]. International Conference on Machine Learning, Corvallis, 2007: 759-766.
  • 7Qiao Li-shan, Chen Song-can, and Tan Xiao-yang. Sparsity preserving projection with applications to face recognition [J] Pattern Recognition, 2010, 43(1): 331-341.
  • 8Han Ya-hong, Wu Fei, Zhuang Yue-ting, et al. Multi-label transfer learning with sparse representation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2010, 20(8): 1110-1121.
  • 9Aharon M, Elad M, and Bruckstein A. K-SVD: an algorithm for designing over-complete dictionaries for sparse representation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2006, 54(11): 4311-4322.
  • 10Mairal J, Bach F, Ponce J, ct al.. Online learning for matrix factorization and sparse coding [J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2010, 11(1): 19-60.

共引文献110

同被引文献54

  • 1CAMPS-VALLS G, TUIA D L, BRUZZONE J. Atli-Benediktsson. Advances in hyperspectral image classification [J]. IEEE Signal Process, 2014, 21(4):45-54.
  • 2BIOUCAS-DIAS J, PLAZA A, CAMPS-VALLS G, et al.. Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges [J]. IEEE Remote Sens., 2013, 1(2):6-36.
  • 3BIOUCAS-DIAS J M, PLAZA A, DOBIGEON N, et al.. Hyperspectral unmixing overview:Geometrical, statistical, sparse regression-based approaches[J]. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Appl. Earth Observ., 2012, 5(2):354-379.
  • 4MAIRAL J, BACH F, PONCE J. Task-driven dictionary learning [J]. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2012, 34(4):791-804.
  • 5IORDACHE M, BIOUCAS-DIAS J, PLAZA A. Total variation spatial regularization for sparse hyperspectral unmixing [J]. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2012, 50(11):4484-4502.
  • 6CHEN Y, NASRABADI N M, TRAN T P. Hyperspectral image classification using dictionary-based sparse representation [J]. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2011, 49(10):3973-3985.
  • 7CHARLES A, OLSHAUSEN B, ROZELL C. Learning sparse codes for hyperspectral imagery [J]. IEEE Sel. Topics Signal Process, 2011, 5(5):963-978.
  • 8SOLTANI-FARANI A, RABIEE H R. When pixels team up:spatially weighted sparse coding for hyperspectral image classification[J]. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 2015, 12(1):107-111.
  • 9TILTON J C. RHSEG User's Manual (version 1.47) [OL]. http://ipp.gsfc.nasa.gov/RHSEG, 2009.
  • 10TANG Z Q, FU G Y, YU X, et al.. A class-Oriented model for hyperspectral image classification through hierarchy-tree-based selection [C]. The 2nd International Sym. on Computer Vision in Remote Sens., Xiamen, P.R. China: CVRS, 2015, 2:1-4.

引证文献11

二级引证文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部