期刊文献+

限制会阴切开在低位产钳术中的应用 被引量:11

Restrictive use of episiotomy for low forceps delivery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨限制会阴切开在产钳术中的应用价值.方法 对北京市海淀区妇幼保健院2013年6至12月期间分娩的311例低位产钳助产术病例进行分析,其中行限制性会阴侧切的117例产妇为研究组,行常规会阴侧切的194例产妇为对照组,从多个指标比较两种方式对母婴的影响.结果 研究组产时出血量、产后出血量、会阴Ⅰ、Ⅱ度裂伤、产后24 h会阴疼痛VAS评分、会阴缝合时间均低于对照组,P<0.05.会阴血肿、产褥感染、尿潴留发生率、产后住院时间与对照组差异无统计学意义,P>0.05.新生儿窒息率、新生儿产伤、新生儿ICU入住率两组差异无统计学意义,P>0.05.结论 限制会阴切开在低位产钳术助产中的应用,降低会阴切开率、减少产妇出血量及产道损伤,减轻母亲的痛苦,未增加新生儿窒息和产伤,提高阴道分娩质量,是微创理念的体现,值得在临床推广. Objective To explore the restrictive use of episiotomy for low forceps delivery.Methods A total of 311 low forceps delivery women at ≥37 weeks of gestation with live singleton cephalic pregnancies were recruited from June 2013 to December 2013 at our hospital.Among whom,117 women underwent no episiotomy another 194 had mediolateral episiotomy.The maternal and neonatal outcomes of two types of episiotomy were compared.Results The amount of intra and post-partum hemorrhage,Ⅰ-Ⅱ perineal tearing,time of perineal suturing,perineal pain severity of post-partum 24 h significantly decreased than control group (P 〈 0.05).No statistical significant inter-group differences existed in perineal hematoma,postnatal infection,urinary retention or length of stay after childbirth (P 〉 0.05).And no statistically significant inter-group differences existed in incidence rates of neonatal asphyxia,neonatal birth trauma and newborns into neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (P 〉 0.05).Conclusion During low forceps delivery,restrictive use of episiotomy may decrease the rate of episiotomy,reduce the amount of hemorrhage,minimize maternal injury,relieve pain and have no adverse effects on neonatal morbidities.And it improves the quality of vaginal delivery and demonstrate the concept of mini-invasiveness so that it is worthy of wider promotions.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第17期1328-1330,共3页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 产钳术 会阴切开 微创 Forceps delivery Episiotomy Mini-invasiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献44

  • 1董金林,倪美菊,朱钟治.会阴Ⅲ度撕裂50例分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,1996,12(3):153-154. 被引量:17
  • 2王炳顺,周利锋,高尔生,朱丽萍,高晓玲.产妇产后对分娩方式的再认识[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(20):2784-2787. 被引量:32
  • 3Frankman E A, Wang L, Bunker C H, et al. Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed ?[J]. Am 30bstet Gynecol, 2009,200(5) :573.e1-573.e7.
  • 4Hartmann K, Kiswanathan M, Palmieri R, et al. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review [J]. JAMA, 2005, 293 ( 17 ) : 2141-2148.
  • 5Ho J J, Pattanittum P, Japaraj R P, et al. Influence of training in the use and generation of evidence on episiotomy practice and perineal trauma [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2010,111 (1):13-18.
  • 6van Dillen J, Spaans M, van Keijsteren W, et al. A prospective multicenter audit of labor-room episiotomy and anal sphincter injury assessment in the Netherlands [J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2010, 108(2) :97-100.
  • 7Ould F.A treatise of midwife [M]. London:J Buckland, 1741: 145-146.
  • 8Thacker SB,Banta HD.Benefits and risks of episiotomy:an interpretative review of the English language literature,1860- 1980[J].Obstet Gynecol Surv,1983,38:322-338.
  • 9Buekens P, Lagasse R,Dramaix M,et al.Episiotomy and third degree tears[J].Br J Obstet Gynaecol,1985,92:820-823.
  • 10Mascarenhas L,Eliot BW,Mackenzie IZ.A comparison of perinatal outcome, antenatal and intrapartum care between England and Wales,and France[J].Br J Obstet Gynaecol,1992,99:955-958.

共引文献126

同被引文献93

引证文献11

二级引证文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部