期刊文献+

D3卵裂期胚胎玻璃化冷冻技术在IVF实验室中的应用 被引量:2

Application of D3 cleavage stage embryo vitrification freezing technology in IVF laboratories
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨玻璃化冷冻技术在人类卵裂期胚胎冻存中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析本中心261个冷冻胚胎复苏周期,比较2种冷冻方法的胚胎存活率、完好率、妊娠率和种植率等数据。结果玻璃化冷冻组的存活率(97.11%)、完好率(89.02%)和种植率(23.12%)显著高于程序化组(91.31%、63.73%、16.31%)(P<0.05),而妊娠率和平均年龄、平均移植胚胎数、平均内膜厚度两组间无统计学差异(40.26%vs40.22%、31.3±5.3vs32.2±5.5、2.25±0.55vs2.27±0.70、8.9±1.1vs9.1±1.6)(P>0.05)。结论玻璃化冷冻是卵裂期胚胎保存的优选方法。 Objective To explore the development potential of embryo and its breadboard outcome after cryopr- eservation with vitrification and programmed freezing methods. Methods In the retrospective study, a total of 261 frozen embryos were studied. The ratio of embryos survival, blastomere integrity, implantation and clinical preg- nancy were compared between these two methods. Results Compared with the programmed frozen embryos, the Vitrified embryos had a higher survival rate (97.11% vs 91.31% ), blastomere integrity rate (89.02% vs 63 73% ) and implantation rate (23.12% vs 16.31% ) (P 〈0.05). However, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate(40.26% vs 40.21% ) , the average number of transferred embryos (2.25±0.55 vs 2.27 ± 0.70), the average age (31.3 ± 5.3 vs 32.2 ± 5.5 ) and the endometrial thickness (8.9 ± 1.1 vs 9.1 ± 1.6) between these two different freezing methods (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion The outcome of vitrification is better than the programmed freezing method.
出处 《合肥医学院学报》 2015年第2期193-196,共4页 Journal of Zunyi Medical University
基金 合肥医学院硕士启动基金资助项目(NO:2007-54)
关键词 卵裂期胚胎 玻璃化更冷冻 程序化冷冻 cleavage stage embryos vitrification programmed freezing
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Yavin S, Aroyo A, Roth Z, et al. Embryo cryopreservation in the presence of low concentration of vitrification solu- tion with sealed pulled straws in liquid nitrogen slush [J]. Hum Repord, 2009, 24 (4) :797 -804.
  • 2郑爱燕,丁洁,顾斌,李红,王玮.玻璃化冷冻与程序化冷冻对胚胎发育潜能及临床结局的影响[J].生殖与避孕,2013,33(1):16-20. 被引量:20
  • 3Bielanski A, Vajta G. Risk of contamination of germplasm during cryopreservation and cryobanking in IVF units [ J]. Hum Reprod,2009,24(10) : 2457 - 2467.
  • 4Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, et al. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embry- os and the elimination of potential contamination[ J ]. Re- prod Biomed Online, 2005, 11 (5) :608 -614.
  • 5Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Eftekhari - Yazdi P, Karimian L, et al. Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent sur- vival, postwarming embryo morphology andpregnancy out- comes for humancleaved embryos [ J ]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2009, 26 (6) :347 -354.
  • 6Mojtaba R V,Poopak E Y,Leita K,et al. Vitrification versus slaw freezing gives excellent surival, post warming enbryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved em- bryos [ J ]. Assist Reprod Genet ,2009,26 (6) :347 - 354.
  • 7Zhu D, Zhang J, Cao S, et al. Vitrification - warmed blastocystransfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and im- plantationrates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cy-cles: time for a new embryo transfer strategy [ J ]. Fertil Steril, 2011, 95(5) :1691.
  • 8Sheehan C B, Lane M, Gardner D K. The cryoloop facili- tates revitrification of embryos at four successive stages of development without impairing embryo growth [ J ]. Hum Reprod,2006,21 ( 11 ) :2978 - 2984.
  • 9Nina D. Cryoloop vitrification of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos : post - vitrification development, pregnan- cy outcomes and livebirths[J]. Reprod Biomed Online,2007, 14(2) :208 -213.
  • 10王俊霞,朱桂金,魏玉兰,王雁林.应用胚胎玻璃化冷冻技术获得临床妊娠及分娩一例[J].中华妇产科杂志,2004,39(2):143-143. 被引量:20

二级参考文献22

  • 1Vlahos NF,Gregoriou O.Prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.Ann N Y Acad Sci,2006,1092:247-264.
  • 2Testart J,Lassalle B,Belaisch-Allart J,et al.High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing.Fertil Steril,1986,46(2):268-272.
  • 3Basir GS,O WS,Ng EH,et al.Morphometric analysis of peri-implantation endometrium in patients having excessively high oestradiol concentrations after ovarian stimulation.Hum Reprod,2001,16(3):435-440.
  • 4Haouzi D,Assou S,Mahmoud K,et al.Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity:comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients.Hum Reprod,2009,24(6):1436-1445.
  • 5Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, et al. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online, 2005, 11(5):608-14.
  • 6Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, et al. A randomized controlled study of human day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and biastocyst formation. Hum Reprod, 2008, 23(9): 1976-82.
  • 7Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM, et al. Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better preg- nancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online, 2005, 11(4):434-7.
  • 8Mojtaba RV, Poopak EY, Leita K, et al. Vitrification versus slaw freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2009, 26(6):347-54.
  • 9Uechi H,Tsutsumi O,Morita Y,et al.Comparison of the effects of controlled-rate cryopreservation and vitrification on 2-cell mouse embryos and their subsequent development[].Human Reproduction.1999
  • 10Fathy GM,MacFarlane DR,Angell CA,et al.Vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation[].Cryobiology.1984

共引文献45

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部