期刊文献+

比较三种梅毒检测方法

To Compare Three Kinds of Syphilis Examination Methods
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的对TP-ELISA,TP-PA,TRUST3种梅毒检测方法进行比较,根据各试验的优点和不足,选择一种常规梅毒筛查的理想方法。方法以TP-ELISA,TPPA,TRUST同时检测样本2115例。结果 ELISA阳性者80例,检出率3.8%(80/2115),TP-ELISA阳性同时TPPA阳性77例,符合率96.2%(77/80),TP-ELISA阳性,TPPA阴性3例,假阳性率为3.75%(3/80)。TRUST阳性20例,符合率25%(20/80),TRUST阴性60例,占75%(60/80)。3例ELISA阳性TPPA阴性的TRUST检测结果均为阴性。结论 TP-ELISA可作为梅毒筛查的理想方法。 Objective To compare three kinds of syphilis examination methods, they are TP - ELISA, TP - PA and TRUST. On the basis of advantages and disadvantages of every test to choose perfect one for conventional screening of syphilis. Methods Using TP - ELISA, TP - PA and TRUST exam 2115 cases. Results In total TP - ELISA positive samples are 80, positive rate is 3.8% (80/2115). Both TP - ELISA and TP - PA positive samples are 77, confirm rate is 96. 2% (77/80). TP -ELISA positive and TP -PA negative samples are 3 ,TP -ELISA false positive rate is3.75% (3/ 80 ). Among TP -ELISA positive samples, TRSUT positive Samples are 20 cases, confirm rate is 25 % (20/80), the other 60samples'TRUST results are negative The rate is 70. 75% (60/80). Conclusions TP - ELISA is perfect method for conventional Screening of syphilis.
作者 尹丽娟
出处 《航空航天医学杂志》 2015年第5期556-557,共2页 Journal of Aerospace medicine
关键词 梅毒 TP-ELISA TP-PA TRUST Syphilis TP - ELISA TP - PA TRUST
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献52

共引文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部