摘要
历史主义、微观主义、结构主义和民族主义并不能对亚洲悖论产生的根源做出合理解释。东亚国家的"整体关联性"在于均处于国家现代化进程之中。它们在追求国家现代化过程中出现的问题却在不经意间成为"亚洲悖论"的深层根源。一方面,为实现国家现代化,发展就成为东亚国家最为显著的特征,由此造就地区国家间日益紧密的经济、贸易、金融和技术合作,甚至高度的经济相互依赖。另一方面,东亚国家在各个领域发展过程中与发展之后所出现的问题,虽然以国内问题的形式表现出来,但又不可避免地以集体诉求和集体心理的形式反映到国家对外政策层面,导致国家间政治与安全合作严重滞后。但是,即便东亚国家完成了国家现代化的进程也并不必然意味着亚洲悖论就不存在,国家现代化进程的视角只能解释亚洲悖论的源起,并不能预测亚洲悖论的消失。
Historicism,Micro-ism,Structuralism,and Nationalism can't provide a reasonable explanation to the Asian Paradox. The overall correlation of East Asian countries is that they are all in the process of modernization of the country. The issues which occur in this process when East Asian countries pursue modernization become the inner cause of the Asian Paradox. On the one hand,development has become the most significant characteristics in East Asia when countries pursue modernization. The result is that increasingly close economic,trade,financial,and technical cooperation between countries become the main stream in this region,also include a high degree of economic interdependence among countries. On the other hand,the issues emerge when East Asian countries pursue development in various fields,although in the form of domestic problems,but also inevitably in the form of collective appeal and collective psychological level,which are reflected in the country's foreign policy and lead to the lagging in political and security cooperation among countries. However,we should know that even though the East Asian countries have completed the process of modernization,also does not necessarily mean that Asian Paradox doesn't exist. The perspective of national modernization can only explain the paradox originated in Asia but it can't predict the disappearance of it.
出处
《东北亚论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期38-47,127,共10页
Northeast Asia Forum
基金
国家社科基金2014年度青年项目(14CGJ026)
