期刊文献+

腹腔镜下腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫在子宫内膜癌治疗中可行性 被引量:8

Feasibility of laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node dissection in treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫治疗子宫内膜癌的可行性。方法 89例子宫内膜癌患者分为腹腔镜组50例和开腹组39例。比较2组围术期情况,术中、术后并发症及预后。结果 2组腹主动脉旁清扫淋巴结数无显著差异(P>0.05);腹腔镜组出血量显著少于开腹组(P<0.001);腹腔镜组术后病率8%,无切口裂开,开腹组术后病率25.6%,切口裂开4例,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);腹腔镜组术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间均显著短于开腹组(P<0.001);腹腔镜组清扫术时间显著长于开腹组(P<0.001)。结论腹腔镜腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫治疗子宫内膜癌安全、可行,优于传统开腹手术。 Objective To investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node dissection in treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Methods A total of 89 patients with endometrial carcinoma were divided into laparoscopy group( n = 50) and open surgery group( n =39). Perioperative conditions,intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference of number of dissected lymph nodes between two groups( P 0. 05). Amount of bleeding in the laparoscopy group was significantly less than that in the open surgery group( P 0. 001). Lower febrile morbidity rate of the laparoscopy group was 8%,which was significantly lower than 25. 6% of the open surgery group( P 0.05). There were 4 cases of wound disruption in the open surgery group,and that was not observed in the laparoscopy group( P 0. 05). Gastrointestinal recovery time and hospital stay of the laparoscopy group were significantly shorter than those of the open surgery group( P 0. 001),but the time of lymph node dissection was significantly longer than the open surgery group( P 0. 001). Conclusion Laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node dissection is safe and feasible for treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma,and its efficacy is better than the conventional open surgery.
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2015年第5期64-66,70,共4页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
基金 江苏省卫生厅专项科研基金(YG201302)
关键词 腹腔镜 子宫内膜癌 腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫 laparoscopy endometrial carcinoma para-aortic lymph node dissection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献42

  • 1张华伟,张向宁,韩秋峪.腹腔镜在妇科肿瘤治疗中的应用[J].山东医药,2005,45(24):81-82. 被引量:6
  • 2Ordemann J, Jacobi CA, Schwenk W, et al. Cellular and humoral innammatory response after laparoscopie and conventional eoloreetal resections [J] . Surg Endosc, 2001, 15 (6) : 600.
  • 3Sietses C, Havenith CE, Eijsbouts QA, et al. Laparoscopic surgery preserves monocytc - mediated tumor cell killing in contrast to the conventional approach [J] . Surg Endosc, 2000, 14 (5) : 456.
  • 4Burpee SE, Kurian M, Murakame Y, et al. The metabolic and immune response to laroscopie vs open liver resection [ J]. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16 (6): 899.
  • 5Rawal N. Postoperative pain management in surgery [ J ]. Anaesthesia, 1998,53 : 50 - 52.
  • 6Nobuo Yaegashi,Kiyoshi Ito,Hitoshi Niikura.Lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: is paraaortic lymphadenectomy necessary?[J]. International Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2007 (3)
  • 7Sonoda Y,,Zerbe M,Smith A,et al.High incidence ofpositive 3.peritoneal cytology in low-risk endometrialcancer treated by laparoscopically assisted. Gynecologic Oncology . 2008
  • 8Cho YH,Kim DY,Kim JH,et al.Laparoscopic manage-ment of early uterine cancer:10-Year experience in AsianMedical Center. Gynecologic Oncology . 2007
  • 9Lurain JR.Uterine Cancer. Berek&Novak’’s Gynecology . 2007
  • 10Kalogiannidis I,,Lambrechts S,Amant F,et al.Laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer:safety,recurrence,and longterm outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . 2007

共引文献51

同被引文献80

  • 1陈晓红,黄浩.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的临床对比分析——前瞻性随机对照研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(3):210-212. 被引量:19
  • 2纪荣明,蒋尔鹏,申晓军,熊绍虎,林宁,刘芳,李玉泉,刘艳春,马立业.腹部手术致乳糜漏解剖学基础的研究[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(14):857-860. 被引量:55
  • 3颜笑健,李光仪,陈露诗,尚慧玲,林铁成,梁立治.腹腔镜广泛全子宫切除加盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫恶性肿瘤安全性分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(12):945-947. 被引量:17
  • 4Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection [ J ]. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1994, 166 (3) : 864- 865.
  • 5Querleu D. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy [ J ]. American journal of obstetrics & gynecology, 1993, 168 (5) : 1643-1645.
  • 6Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer [ J]. Bailliere S Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1995, 9 (4) : 675-689.
  • 7Spirtos NM, Schlaerth JB, Kimball RE, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type Ⅲ ) with aortic and pelvie lymphadenectomy [ Jl. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996, 174 (6) : 1763-1768.
  • 8Pomel C, Atallah D, Bouedec GL, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: 8-year experience of a pilot study [ J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2003, 91 (3): 534-539.
  • 9Gil-Moreno A, Puig O, Prrez-Benavente MA, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type Ⅱ-Ⅲ ) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer [ J ]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2005, 12 (2) : 113-120.
  • 10Ptslomovitz R. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience [J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2006, 102 (2): 252-255.

引证文献8

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部