期刊文献+

氨磺必利与喹硫平治疗慢性精神分裂症患者的对照研究 被引量:1

Control study of Amisulpride and Quetiapine in treatment of chronic schizophrenia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨氨磺必利治疗慢性精神分裂症患者的疗效与安全性。方法:将80例慢性精神分裂症患者随机分为氨磺必利组和喹硫平组,每组40例,分别给予患者氨磺必利和喹硫平治疗,疗程12周。于治疗前和治疗2、4、8、12周,采用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、临床疗效总评量表(CGI-SI)评定两组患者的临床疗效;不良反应量表(TESS)、锥体外系副反应量表(RSESE)评定两组患者的不良反应。结果:两组患者的显效率(P>0.05)和有效率(P>0.05)差异无统计学意义;治疗2周,氨磺必利组患者的阳性症状分、阴性症状分、PANSS总分及CGI-SI评分较治疗前显著降低(P<0.05或P<0.001);喹硫平组患者则于治疗4周,PANSS总分及各因子分、CGI-SI评分较治疗前显著降低(P<0.05或P<0.001);治疗4周(P<0.05)、8周(P<0.05)、12周(P<0.05),氨磺必利组患者的PANSS阴性症状分明显优于喹硫平组;两组患者的不良反应较少。结论:氨磺必利治疗慢性精神分裂症患者安全有效。 Objective:To explore efficacy and safety of Amisulpride in treatment of chronic schizophrenia. Methods:80 pa-tients with chronic schizophrenia were randomly assigned to Amisulpride group (n=40) and Quetiapine group (n=40) and treated for 12 weeks. Positive and negative symptom scale ( PANSS) , clinical global impression-severity scale ( CGI-SI) were used to evaluate the efficacy;treatment emergent symptom scale ( TESS) and rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects ( RSESE) were used to meas-ure the side effect before and 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the treatment. Results:There were no significant differences in the obvious effective rate (P>0. 05) and the effective rate (P>0. 05) between the two groups. From the 2nd week, the total scores of PANSS, positive symptom scores, negative symptoms scores and CGI-SI scores of Amisulpride group decreased more remarkably than those be-fore the treatment (P<0. 05 or P<0. 001). From the 4th week, the total and factor scores of PANSS and CGI-SI scores of Quetiapine group decreased more remarkably than those before the treatment (P<0. 05). At the end of the 4th (P<0. 05), 8th (P<0. 05), and 12th (P<0. 05) week, the negative symptoms scores of Amisulpride group were obviously better than those of Quetiapine group. Both groups had fewer adverse reactions. Conclusions:Amisulpride is an effective and safe drug in the treatment of chronic schizophrenia.
出处 《中国民康医学》 2015年第8期9-10,13,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 氨磺必利 喹硫平 慢性精神分裂症 Amisulpride Quetiapine Chronic schizophrenia
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

  • 1刘俊彪,吴靖华.氯丙嗪、氯氮平、利培酮对首发精神分裂症患者糖代谢、血脂和体重的影响[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2004,30(4):293-295. 被引量:41
  • 2[1]Schoemaker H,Claustre Y,Fage D,et al.Neurochemical characteristics of Amisulpride,an atypical dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist with both presynaptic and limbic selectivity.J Pharmacol Exp Ther,1997,280(1):83
  • 3[2]Perrault G H,Depoortere D,Morel E,et al.Psychopharmacological profile of amisulpride.An antipsychotic drug with presynaptic D2/D3 dopamine receptor antagonist activity and limbic selectivity.J Pharmacol Exp Ther,1997,280(1):73
  • 4[3]Paillere-Martinot M L,Lecrubier Y,Martinot J C,et al.Improvement of some schizophrenic deficit symptoms with low doses of amisulpride.Am J Psychiatry,1995,152(1):130
  • 5[4]Vanelle J M,Olie P,Levy-Soussan P.New antipsychotics in schizophrenia:the French experience.Acta Psychiatr Scand,1994,89(suppl 380):59
  • 6[5]Boyer P,Lecrubier Y,Puech A J,et al.Treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia with amisulpride.Br J Psychiatry,1995,166:68
  • 7[6]Loo H,Poirier-LITTRE M F,Theron M,et al.Amisulpride versus placebo in the medium-term treatment of the negative symptoms of schizoprenia.Br J Psychiatry,1997,170:18
  • 8[7]Rein W,Turjanski S.Clinical update on amisulpride in deficit schizophrenia.Int-Clin-Psychopharmacol,1887,12(2):19
  • 9[8]Speller J C,Barnes T R E,Curson D A,et al.One-year,low-dose neuroleptic study of in-patients with chronic schizophrenia characterised by presistent negative symptoms:Amisulpride vs Haoperidol.Br J Psychiatry,1997,171:564
  • 10[9]Freeman H L.Amisulpride compared with standard neuroleptics in acute exacerbations of schizophrenia:three efficacy studies.Int Clin Pshcyopharmacol,1997,12(2):11

共引文献301

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部