期刊文献+

影响T_1、T_2乳腺癌淋巴结转移率的单因素分析 被引量:4

Influential factors of T_1,T_2 breast cancer lymph node metastatic rate
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:回顾性分析乳腺癌患者的临床资料,探讨影响T1、T2乳腺癌淋巴结转移率的临床因素。方法:对中国人民解放军第八二医院2003年到2013年确诊的134例乳腺癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果:全组均为女性患者,年龄27-74岁,中位年龄为48岁。单因素分析结果显示,患者年龄、肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置、病理类型、ER、PR、HER-2与T1、T2乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移率有统计学意义。P值分别为0.012、0.001、0.015、0.048、0.002、0.001、0.001。结论:老年组、T1组、其他象限组、特殊类型乳腺癌组、ER(+)组、PR(+)组、HER-2(-)组淋巴结转移率水平较低,更有可能选择前哨淋巴结活检术进一步检测。 Objective:Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed to explore the T1 ,T2 breast cancer lymph node rate.Methods:Clinical data of 134 cases of breast cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed.Results:All 134 pa-tients were women,aged 27-74,the median age was 48.Single factor analysis results showed that patient age,tumor size,tumor location,tumor pathologic type,ER,PR,HER-2 and T1 ,T2 LNR of breast cancer have statistical signifi-cance.P values were 0.012,0.001,0.015,0.048,0.002,0.001,0.001.Conclusion:Old -aged group,T1,other quadrants group,special type breast group,ER(+),PR(+),HER-2 (-)group the low level of LNR are more likely to choose sentinel lymph node biopsy.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2014年第9期2098-2100,共3页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 乳腺癌 腋窝淋巴结转移率 前哨淋巴结活检术 breast cancer axillary lymph node rate sentinel lymph node biopsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献66

共引文献169

同被引文献44

  • 1李占文,李振平,胡云锵,杨华峰,刘纯,贺亚娟.176例Ⅱ、Ⅲ期乳腺癌腋淋巴结转移临床病理相关因素分析[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(5):282-284. 被引量:11
  • 2马榕.乳腺癌改良根治术中清扫腋窝Ⅲ组淋巴结的经验与技巧[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(4):298-299. 被引量:13
  • 3Lucci A, Mcall LM, Beitsch PD, et al. Surgical complicationsassociated with sentinel lymph node dissection(SLND) plus axil- lary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the A- merican College of Surgeones Oncology Group Ttial Z001 l[J]. J Clin Oncol,2007,25(24) :3657-3663.
  • 4Ahmed M, Usiskin SI, Hall-Craggs MA, et al. Is imaging the future of axillary staging in breast cancei?[J]. Eur Radiol, 2014,24(2) :288-293.
  • 5Yang M, Li X, Chun-Hong P,et al. Pure mucinous breast carci- noma~ a favorable subtype[J]. Breast Care (Basel, Switzer- land) ,2013,8(1) :56-59.
  • 6Omranipour R, Alipour S, Hadji M,et al. Two decades of expe rience with duetal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the cancer in- stitute of tehran, iran[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2014,15 (6):2771- 2776.
  • 7Yi A, Moon WK, Cho N, et al. Association of tumor stiffness on sonoelasto- graphy with axillary nodal status in T1 breast ca- icinoma patients[J]. Eur Radiol,2013, 23(11) : 2969-2978.
  • 8Nadeem RM. The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial for the axillary management of a select group of invasive breast cancer patients= SLNB vs. on-SLNB[J]. Breast Cancer, 2015,22 (4):343-349.
  • 9Gentilini O, Veronrsi U. Abandoning sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer? A new trial in progress at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (SOUND= Sentinel node vs Obser- vation after axillary UltraSouND) [J].Breast, 2012,21 (5): 678- 681.
  • 10徐磊,张凯,金培勇,邓文胜,马榕,孙靖中.201例乳腺癌患者腋淋巴结转移的临床研究[J].中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2008,2(2):29-31. 被引量:9

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部