期刊文献+

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床对照研究 被引量:8

Comparative Study on Transumbflical Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Traditional Laparoscopic Choleeystectomy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,在有气腹和无气腹条件下与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除手术的差别,探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除手术的可行性和安全性.方法对成都市第二人民医院2013年10月至2014年5月收治的l80例胆囊炎病例,按照随机原则分为常规腹腔镜组(60例)、单孔腹腔镜有气腹组(60例)和单孔腹腔镜无气腹组(60例)对3组的手术时间、术中出血量、肠道功能恢复时间、住院时间、并发症、术后切口和腰背部疼痛评分、C-反应蛋白水平、患者满意度评分进行比较.结果单孔腹腔镜组(有气腹和无气腹)比传统腹腔镜组的术中出血量少、术后伤口疼痛评分低(P<0.05);在无气腹条件下单孔腹腔镜组的胃肠道功能恢复时间更短、术后C-反应蛋白更低、并发症发生率更低(P<0.05).结论单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术比传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术组,能够减少术中出血、减轻术后疼痛;且在无气腹条件下能够减轻术后应急反应,减少术后不良反应和并发症,更有利于术后恢复、具有更高的患者满意度.是值得临床推广的一种手术方法. Objective To analyze the clinical effect and safety of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods Sixty patients received transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(60 case),transumbilical single-port with pneumoperitoneal laparoscopic cholecystectomy group(60 cases) and transumbilical single-port with gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy group(60 cases) from October 2013 to May 2014 were included in the study. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time,intra-operative blood loss, postoperative intestinal function recovery time,length of hospital stay,complications,postoperative wound and back pain score, C-reactive protein levels and satisfaction scores were compared between three groups. Results The transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectom group(pneumoperitoneum and gasless) had less blood loss than traditional laparoscopic group, postoperative wound pain score was lower(P〈 0.05). Compared with traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy,transumbilical single-port with gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy had shorter postoperative intestinal function recovery time,the less postoperative C-reactive protein level, a lower incidence of complications(P 〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectom has less blood loss and postoperative wound and back pain under, and transumbilical single-port with gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy has advantages of less postoperative adverse reactions and complications postoperative pain, faster recovery, higher patient satisfaction, so it is a safe, feasible and more minimally invasive surgery.
作者 罗礼君 祖存
出处 《昆明医科大学学报》 CAS 2015年第3期102-104,109,共4页 Journal of Kunming Medical University
基金 成都军区十二五课题基金资助项目(C14053)
关键词 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 经脐 单孔 无气腹 Cholecystectomy Laparoscopy Transumbilical Single-port Gasless
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1RAMAN J D, BENSALAH K, BAGRODIA A,et al. Labo- ratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy[ J ]. Urology, 2007,70(6 ): 1 039-- 1 042.
  • 2NOGUERA J, TEJADA S, TORTAJADA C, et al. Prospe- ctive, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a sin- gle-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study [J]. Surg Endosc,2013,27 ( 11 ):4 284--4 290.
  • 3CHOI Y S,PARK J N,OH Y S,et al Single-port vs. con- ventional multi-port access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes and compli- cations [J ]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2013,169 (2):366--369.
  • 4FRUTOS M D, ABRISQUETA J, LUJAN I, et al. Rando - mized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendec- tomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy [J]. Ann Surg,2013,257(3):413--418.
  • 5刘南,张光永,胡三元.悬吊式经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2011,16(2):95-99. 被引量:38
  • 6张忠涛,周晓娜.经自然孔道内镜外科技术发展现状与展望[J].中国实用外科杂志,2009,29(1):35-37. 被引量:49

二级参考文献56

  • 1Rao GV. Transgastrie appendectomy results and follow up, SAGES transgastric surgery panel [C]. Presented at SAG ES Meeting, 2006.
  • 2Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Ikeda K, et al. Endoscopic transgastric lymphadeneclomy by using EUS for selection and guidance [ J ]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2006,63 (2) :302-306.
  • 3Wilhelm D, Meining A, yon Delius S, et al. An innovative, safe and sterile sigmoid access (ISSA) for NOTES [J]. Endoscopy, 2007,39:401-406.
  • 4Kantsevoy SV, Hu B, Jagannath SB, et al. Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy-is it possible?[J].Surg Endosc, 2006,20: 522-525.
  • 5Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, et al. Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model [J]. Gastrointest Endos,2006,63( 2 ): 307-312.
  • 6Jagannath S, Kantsevoy S, Vaughn C, et al. Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model [ J ]. Gastrointest Endosc,2005,61 (3): 449-453.
  • 7Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2004,60(1):114 -117.
  • 8Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, et al. Endoscopic gasirojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model [J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2005,62( 2 ):287-292.
  • 9Kantsevoy SV, Niiyama H, Jagannath SB, et al. The endoscopic transilluminator: an endoscopic device for identification of the proximal jejunum for transgastric endoscopic gastrnjejunostomy [J].Gastrointest Endosc,2006,63( 9 ): 1055-1058.
  • 10Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, et al. A novel safe approach to the peritoneal cavity for per-oral transgastrie endoscopic procedures [J]. Gasirointest Enclose,2007,65(3): 497-500.

共引文献85

同被引文献80

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部