摘要
陈金钊教授最近提出了一种与西方法律修辞学不同的"把法律作为修辞"理论,该理论因其独特的涵义界定、价值立场和修辞方法而受到不少学者的质疑和批判。"把法律作为修辞"理论并非作者自由的学术创造,该理论几乎所有的构成元素都可以根据法治理论、法教义学、法律话语、分析修辞学、最新的法律修辞学理论等获得相应的理论证成。因此,在某种意义上可以说,"把法律作为修辞"更是对西方法律修辞学的一种学术改造和重构。
Recently, Dr. Professor Chen Jinzhao presented a ＂Law As Rhetoric＂ theory ; unlike western legal rhetoric theories, ＂Law As Rhetoric＂ theory persists in its specific definition, value position and rhetoric methods, which has been questioned and criticized by many researchers. This paper attempts to point out, that all constructs of ＂law as Rhetorical＂ theory could be sup- ported and verified theoretically from the rule of law theory, law dogmatic, analysis of legal discourse, rhetoric and western legal rhetoric, etc.. Meanwhile, ＂law as Rhetorical＂ theory also exposes its weakness and limitations in what it emphasizes on all sorts of ＂overall planning＂ from rhetorical method.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期53-62,共10页
Legal Forum
基金
2010年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<法律方法理论研究>(10JJD820008)的阶段性成果
