期刊文献+

基于改进MNL模型的地铁换乘区路径选择 被引量:5

Pedestrian route choice in transfer area of subway station based on improved MNL model
原文传递
导出
摘要 以行人路径的完整过程为研究基础,分析组成路径的不同设施对行人路径选择以及路径效用的影响,同时对同种类型设施在不同路径中的效用值做了深入的调查分析,并根据效用最大化理论,建立了改进的Multinomial Nested Logit(MNL)模型和路径效用函数。通过对轨道换乘车站行人路径选择的跟随问询调查,研究影响行人在轨道车站换乘区域内路径选择的因素。根据效用最大化理论,建立了改进的Multinomial Nested Logit(MNL)模型和路径效用函数。以北京市地铁国贸站换乘调查数据为基础,标定了模型参数。模型分析表明:行人在轨道车站换乘区域的路径选择与出行目的及各交通换乘设施的走行时间有关;同时,路径重复系数对路径效用的影响较大,进而影响路径选择行为,佐证了行人对拥挤路径的规避行为;得到的模型具有很高的精度,为评价和提高轨道换乘车站设施服务效率提供理论依据。 Based on pedestrian path tracing, this paper analyzed the influence of different facilities on pedestrian route choice path selection and route utility in the Transfer area of subway station, and the utility value of the same type facility in different routes. Through the investigation of pe- destrian route choice, it studied the factors of pedestrian route choice in the Transfer area of sub- way station. According to maximum utility theory, the improved multinomial nested logit (MNL) model and route utility function were established, and the parameters of this model were determined. The model analysis shows that pedestrian route the choice is related to trip purposes and travel time on the facilities, and path overlap factor has big effect on route utility. The con- clusion provides proofs with the circumvention of the crowded path. The model established has high accuracy, and could provide theoretical basis with the evaluation of subway station service in the Transfer area of subway station. 4 tabs, 20 refs.
出处 《长安大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期152-156,共5页 Journal of Chang’an University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(50308018)
关键词 交通工程 轨道交通 换乘区域 行人路径选择 改进MNL模型 路径效用函数 traffic engineering subway station transfer area pedestrian route choice improvedmultinomial nested logit mode route utility function
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1王建聪.城市客运枢纽换乘组织关键问题研究[D].北京:北京交通大学.2006.
  • 2Cheung C Y,William H K L. Pedestrian route choicesbetween escalator and stairway in MTR Stations[J].Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1998,124(3):277-285.
  • 3Daamen W? Bovy P H L,Hoogendoom S P,et al. Pas-senger route choice concerning level changes in rail-way stations [ C]//Transportation Research BoardTransportation Research Board Annual Meeting,Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2005 :1-18.
  • 4大島義行,松橋貞雄,三浦秀一.鉄道駅G扫(t石乗換抵抗仁関1-石基礎的研究[J]. 土木計画学研究?講演集,1996,11(2):701-702.
  • 5何静,刘志钢,孙有望.基于乘客能量和心理阻抗的换乘便利性分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(1):92-97. 被引量:11
  • 6周溪召,胡文君.路径选择中重叠路线的解决方法比较[J].公路工程,2010,35(1):28-32. 被引量:2
  • 7刘莹,吴娇蓉,林航飞.轨道交通车站行人路径选择研究[J].城市交通,2008,6(6):46-53. 被引量:10
  • 8Hoogendoorn S P, Bovy P H L. Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models[J].Transportation Research Part B; Methodological,2004,38(2);169-190.
  • 9Hoogendoom L S,van Ness R,Bovy P H L. Path-sizemodeling in multi-modal route choice analysis [J].Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting,inCd-rom with proceedings, 2005 ?1921) : 27-34.
  • 10白鸿宇,严海,刘诗序.基于PSL模型的轨道车站行人路径选择研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2012,36(1):149-152. 被引量:1

二级参考文献33

  • 1王德,马力,朱玮.2010年上海世博会场内人流模拟分析[J].城市规划学刊,2006(3):58-63. 被引量:12
  • 2刘学军.地铁换乘行为及换乘站布置选型[J].城市轨道交通研究,2006,9(8):25-28. 被引量:40
  • 3夏目浩次,若林拓史.障害属性を考慮しに駅空間にぁけゐ移動容易性に関すゐ研究[C]//第55回土木学会年次学術講演会講演概要集.熊本:日本土木学会,2000:186-190.
  • 4三浦秀一,加藤新一郎,大岛義行.秉換駅にぁけゐ移動抵抗汇すゐ研究[C]∥第51回土木学会年次学術講演会講演概要集.札幌:日本土木学会,1996:218-219.
  • 5大岛義行,松橘贞雄,三浦秀一.铁道职にぁけゐ秉换抵抗に関すゐ基礎的研究[J].土木针画学研究·清演集,1996,11(2):701.
  • 6加藤浩德,芝海润,林淳,等.都市铁道駅にぁけゐ秉继利便性向上施策の評価手法に関すゐ研究[J].運输政策研究,2000,3(2):9.
  • 7飯田克弘,新田保次,森康男,等.铁道駅にぁけゐ秉換ぇ行動の担度とアクセツピリラィに関すゐ研究[J].土木针画学研究·講演集,1996,11(2):705.
  • 8屋井鉄雄,岩倉成志,伊東誠.铁道ネットヮ-クの需要と余剩の推定方法にっぃて[J].土木补画学研究·输文集,1993(11):81.
  • 9Kunihiro KISHI, Keiichi SATOH. Evaluation of willingness to buy a low-pollution car in Japan[J]. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2005,6 : 3121.
  • 10关宏志.非集计模型[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2006.

共引文献33

同被引文献50

  • 1吕慎,李旭宏.城市客运换乘枢纽设施布局效用分析[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2006,36(6):1024-1028. 被引量:17
  • 2Roper J, Marsden G. Valuing home delivery-Where' s my stuff [J]. Wasted Miles, Wasted Money (a less congested, more energy efficient future), 2006 : 53-60.
  • 3Esper T L, Jensen T D,Turnipseed F L, et al. The last mile:an examination of effects of online retail delivery strategies on consumers[J]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2003, 24 (2) : 177-203.
  • 4Browne M, Allen J, Anderson S. Overview of home delivery in the UK[R]. Westminster: University of Westminster, 2001.
  • 5Punakivi M,Yrjola H, Holmstrom J. Solving the last mile issue: reception box or delivery box? [J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution > Logistics Management, 2001, al (6) :427-439.
  • 6Kgm/ir/iinen V, Saranen J, Holmstr6m J. The reception box impact on home delivery efficiency in the e-grocery business [J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management, 2001,31 (6) = 414-426.
  • 7Su X. Bounded rationality in newsvendor models [J ]. Manufacturing Service Operations Management, 2008, 10 (4) :566-589.
  • 8Chen Y, Su X, Zhao X. Modeling Bounded Rationality in Capacity Allocation Games with the Quantal Response Equilibrium [J]. Management Science, 2012, 58 (10): 1952-1962.
  • 9Hayel Y, Quadri D, Jimfinez T, et al. Decentralized optimization of last-mile delivery services with non-cooperative bounded rational customers[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2014:1- 19.
  • 10Benati S, Hansen P. The maximum capture problem with random utilities Problem formulation and algorithms [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143 (3) : 518-530.

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部