期刊文献+

利用CBCT联合六自由度治疗床研究宫颈癌术后放疗摆位误差及CTV外放边界 被引量:10

Analysis of setup errors and planning target margin by cone-beam CT in combination with HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch for postoperative patients of cervical cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 利用千伏级CBCT联合HexaPOD evo RT六自由度治疗床研究宫颈癌术后盆腔放疗摆位误差,推算CTV外放边界.方法 采用医科达AXESSETM直线加速器治疗宫颈癌术后患者17例.所有患者常规摆位后CBCT,治疗床在线校正后再次CBCT,治疗后再次CBCT,分别获得ⅩⅥ.与计划CT图像配准后,即可获得患者左右、上下、前后方向平移及旋转误差,分析摆位误差及CTV外放边界.采用配对t检验差异.结果 CBCT校正前后均为304次,治疗后68次.所有患者分次间左右、上下、前后方向平移误差和旋转误差经在线校正后均减小,校正前/后绝对值的平均值分别为2.42 mm/0.42 mm、3.55 mm/0.47 mm、3.26 mm/0.27 mm和1.24°/0.24°、0.70°/0.32°、0.57°/0.12°(P=0.036、0.000、0.000、0.002、0.000、0.004).考虑分次内摆位误差影响,治疗床校正后CTV外扩边界在左右、上下、前后方向上分别为2.24、3.32、2.20 mm.结论 宫颈癌术后患者CBCT联合六维治疗床在线校正可明显减小6个方向分次间摆位误差,且能缩小CTV外放边界. Objective To evaluate the setup errors and CTV margins by kV cone-beam CT in combination with HexaPOD evo RT 6D treatment couch for postoperative patients with cervical cancer.Methods Between July 2013 and March 2014,17 postoperative patients with cervical cancer were prospectively enrolled in the study.Each patient would scan the first CBCT after conventional positioning,and their scan after 6D couch online correction,and the last scan after delivery.Then the scans were registered to the planning CT to determine the inter-and intrafractional setup errors in translational and rotational directions.PTV margins were calculated from the systematic (Σ) and random (σ) errors.Results Data set for a total of 676 CBCT scans were obtained from the 17 patients,in which before and after the 6D couch correction were both 304 and after delivery was 68.The interfractional setup errors in translational and rotational directions by 6D couch online correction were significantly decreased.The average absolute values of the pre-/post-correction errors were 2.42 mm/0.42 mm x-axis,3.55 mm/0.47 mm y-axis,3.26 mm/0.27 mm z-axis,1.24°/0.24° pitch,0.70°/0.32° roll,0.57°/0.12° yaw,respectively (P =0.036,0.000,0.000,0.002,0.000,0.004).The total PTV margins (MPTV) accounting for 6 D couch online correction and intrafraction errors were 2.24,3.32,2.20 mm in the left-right (x-axis),superiorinferior (y-axis) and anterior-posterior (z-axis) directions,respectively.Conclusions CBCT in combination with HexaPOD evo RT 6D is an effective modality to evaluate and improve the accuracy of IMRT in postoperative patients with cervical cancer,while putting narrow target margin to reduce the irradiation of normal tissues.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期78-81,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 宫颈肿瘤/图像引导放射疗法 六自由度 摆位误差 外放边界 Cervical neoplasms/image guided radiotherapy 6-degree-of-freedom Setup errors Target margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy [ J]. SeminRadiat Oncol,2004,14(1) :52-64.
  • 2van Herk M, Remeijer P, Rasch C, et al. The probability ofcorrect target dosage : dose-population histograms for derivingtreatment margins in radiotherapy [ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol BiolPhys,2000,47(4) :1121-1135.
  • 3戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(2):132-135. 被引量:184
  • 4Yin WJ, Sun Y,Chi F,et al. Evaluation of inter-fraction andintra-fraction errors during volumetric modulated arc therapy innasopharyngeal carcinoma patients [J/OL]. Radiat Oncol, 2013 ,8:78 [ 2014-05-01 ]. http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627906/. DOI: 10.1 186/1748-717X-8-78.
  • 5Zumsteg Z, DeMarco J, Lee SP, et al. Image guidance duringhead-and-neck cancer radiation therapy : analysis of alignmenttrends with in-room cone-beam computed tomography scans [ J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012, 83 ( 2 ) : 712-719. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijrobp. 2011.08.001.
  • 6Oh YK, Baek J, Kim OB, et al. Assessment of setup uncertaintiesfor various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200VMAT treatments [ J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2014, 15 (2 ):4418. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp. vl5i2. 4418.
  • 7Hunt MA, Kuteher GJ, Burman C, et al. The effect of setupuncertainties on the treatment of nasopharynx cancer [ J] . Int JRadiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1993 ,27(2) :437447.
  • 8Yan D,Lockman D,Martinez A’ et al. Computed tomographyguided management of interfractional patient variation [ J]. SeminRadiat Oncol,2005,15(3) :168-179.
  • 9Jiirgenliemk-Schulz IM,Toet-Bosma MZ,de Kort GA,et al.Internal motion of the vagina after hysterectomy for gynaecologicalcancer [ J]. Radiother Oncol,2011,98 (2) ; 244-248. DOI: 10.1016/j. radonc. 2010.10.026.
  • 10Langen KM, Jones DT. Organ motion and its management [ J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,50( 1 ) :265-278.

二级参考文献47

  • 1戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(2):132-135. 被引量:184
  • 2刘跃平,刘新帆,李晔雄,李涛.盆腔肿瘤三维适形放疗摆位重复性研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(4):313-316. 被引量:44
  • 3邬筱莹,章真,王文超,任珺,郭晓梅,陆惠忠.电子射野影像装置对盆腔肿瘤放疗摆位误差的测定[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(1):52-54. 被引量:26
  • 4van Herk M.Errors and Margins in Radiotherapy.Semin Radiat Onco1,2004,14:52-64.
  • 5McKenzie A,van Herk M,Mijnheer B.Margins for geometric uncertainty around organs at risk in radiotherapy.Radiother Oncol,2002,62:99-307.
  • 6Van Herk M,Remeijer P,Lebesque JV.Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,52:1407-1422.
  • 7Baiter JM,Chen GT,Pelizzari CA,et al.Online repositioning during treatment of the prostate:a study of potential limits and gains.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1993,27:137-143.
  • 8Hunt M.The effect of positional uncertainties on the treatment of primary nasopharynx cancer.Med Phys,1989,16:456-464.
  • 9Stroom JC,Heijmen BJ.Geometrical uncertainties,radiotherapy planning margins,and the ICRU-62 report.Radiother Oncol,2002,64:75 -83.
  • 10Letoumeau D,Wong JW,Oldham M,et al.Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy:technical implementation.Radiother Oncol,2005,75:279 -286.

共引文献220

同被引文献111

  • 1方亚玲,杨欣,曹泓立,孙欣,汪志.锥形束CT联合六维床在宫颈癌VMAT治疗中的应用[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2020(11):1281-1283. 被引量:2
  • 2李珠明,崔玉琴,刘和平,许江兰,白小平.宫颈癌术后调强放疗靶区剂量学研究及危及器官毒性观察[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2011,28(2):2481-2485. 被引量:13
  • 3崔明明,闫镔,曹鸿涛,陈健,曾磊.基于全局二值特征描述子的三维CBCT图像快速匹配算法[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2015,27(4):666-673. 被引量:3
  • 4郁志龙,索志敏,阎瑞敏,张哲林,张保祯,牛广明.240例放射治疗宫颈癌回顾性分析[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2004,36(10):786-788. 被引量:12
  • 5陈真云,盛修贵,李慧芹,李庆水,李大鹏,马志芳,马悦冰,李庆菊.调强放射治疗在宫颈癌术后治疗中的临床研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(7):539-542. 被引量:16
  • 6Dzierma Y,Beyhs M,Palm J,et al.Set-up errors and planning margins in planar and CBCT image-guided radiotherapy using three different imaging systems:A clinical study for prostate and headand-neck cancer[J].Phys Med,2015,31(8):1055-1059.
  • 7Zhang Y,Wu H,Chen Z,et al.Concomitant imaging dose and cancer risk in image guided thoracic radiation therapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2015,93(3):523-531.
  • 8Ciardo D,Alterio D,Jereczek-Fossa BA,et al.Set-up errors in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy:Quantitative comparison between three-dimensional cone-beam CT and two-dimensional kilovoltage images[J].Phys Med,2015,31(8):1015-1021.
  • 9Xin S.Setup errors in cone-beam computed tomography and their effects on acute radiation toxicity in cervical cancerradiotherapy[J].Genet Mol Res,2015,14(3):10937-10943.
  • 10Heijkoop ST,Langerak TR,Quint S,et al.Quantification of intrafraction changes during radiotherapy of cervical cancer assessed with pre-and post-fraction Cone Beam CT scans[J].Radiother Oncol,2015,117(3):536-541.

引证文献10

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部