摘要
现代智库的成长有其深刻的逻辑必然性和合理性。美国是现代智库的摇篮,通过对美国智库成长的历史分析,发现现代智库的成长依循了"知识—权力"和"知识—市场"的逻辑:在权力知识化中深嵌于公共决策过程、在市场机制作用下实现优化发展。现代智库也因此在逻辑上被定位为既是具有市场比较优势的政策知识专业生产者与组织者,又是超越党派政治、独立的"权力/知识"的中介者。但是,在现实中,现代智库成长逻辑存在内在缺陷与异化的可能,包括智库知识与政治权力"双重俘获"的权力逻辑异化、智库功利化与智库思想市场失灵的市场逻辑异化。当前,建设中国特色新型智库,既要吸收和借鉴现代智库成长中的合理因素,同时也要警惕并规避其内在缺陷及异化的风险。基于此,依循现代智库的成长逻辑,从国家层面、市场层面以及智库自身三个维度提出中国智库发展的基本路径。
There must be a deep logical necessity and rationality in the development of the modern think tanks. America is the cradle of modern think tanks. Historical analysis on its growing in the U.S.A. proves that it often follows the logic of ＂knowledge--power＂ and the ＂knowledge--market＂. Therefore, the modern think tanks is, from the point of logic, defined as a professional policy producer and organizer with comparative marketing advantage, as well as an independent medium between power and knowledge that is beyond party politics. In reality, however, there exists in its development the possible inherent flaw and alienation, including the ＂double capture＂ between think tanks and political power, the utilitarianism of think tanks and think tanks idea market failure. At present, to construct a new think tank with Chinese characteristics, we should not only absorb and adopt the reasonable factors from the process of modern think tanks＇ development, but also avoid its internal defects and the risk of alienation, and based on this, we can propose the fundamental development pattern of china＇s think tank from the three aspects of country, market and itself in accordance with the development logic of modern think tanks.
出处
《社会主义研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期139-147,共9页
Socialism Studies
基金
2014年度国家社会科学基金重点项目"公民参与涉政网络事件的有序性研究"(14AZZ015)
2013年度国家社会科学基金一般项目"公共权力运行公开化路径研究"(13BZZ032)
关键词
智库
权力知识化
智库思想市场
Think Tanks
Power Intellectualization
Think Tanks Idea Market
