期刊文献+

专业小组全程化护理干预在永久性肠造口患者中的应用 被引量:36

Application of whole course nursing intervention with professional team for patients with permanent colostomy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨专业小组全程化护理干预在永久性肠造口患者中的应用效果。方法选择2013年4月-2014年3月在我院行永久性肠造口手术的直肠癌患者126例,随机分为对照组(68例)和对照组(58例),干预组采用专业小组全程化护理干预,对照组采用常规护理干预。对比观察出院时两组患者在满意度、造口护理正确例数、自我护理能力及出院时、出院后1个月、3个月肠造口并发症发生例数。结果干预组患者满意度、造口护理正确例数、自护能力较对照组显著提高(P<0.05),造口狭窄和造口周围皮肤并发症在出院后3个月内均显著降低(P<0.05),两组比较差异有统计学意义。结论专业小组全程化护理干预能使永久性肠造口患者得到标准化、规范化及延续性护理,能提高患者自护能力,有效降低造口并发症,改善患者的就医体验及术后生活质量。 Objeetive To study the applying effect of whole course nursing intervention with professional team for patients with permanent colostomy. Method 126 patients with rectal cancer after permanent colostomy were randomly divided into experimental group (68 cases) and control group (58 cases). Patients in experimental group was given the entire process nursing intervention by professional team, patients in control group received conventional nursing intervention. The patients satisfaction, number of cases with colostomy nursing correctly, self-care ability and the number of cases of complications occurred after colostomy cases at discharge 1 month, 3 months after discharge was observed and compared between two groups. Result The patient satisfaction, the number of cases with colostomy nursing correctly, and self-care ability was significantly increased compared with the control group (P〈0.05). The stoma stenosis and peristomal skin complications in 3 months after discharge were significantly reduced(P〈0.05). There were significant differences between two groups. Conclusion By whole course nursing intervention with professional team, the patients with a permanent colostomy can get the thoroughly and standardized care. It can improve patient self-care ability, and effectively reduce the stoma complications and improve patient experience and quality of life of patients after surgery .
出处 《护士进修杂志》 2015年第2期135-138,共4页 Journal of Nurses Training
关键词 专业小组 全程化护理 肠造口 护理 Professional team Whole course nursing Colostom Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1常立阳,冯志仙,邵荣雅,赵雪红,徐红,沈丽娜,邵乐文,章梅云,黄丽华.住院患者护理满意度测评量表的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2012,47(5):454-456. 被引量:148
  • 2Yamashita M. The exercise of self-care agency scale [J]. West- ern journal of nursing research, 1998,20(3) :370-381.
  • 3Wang HI-f, Laffrey S('. Preliminary development and testing of instruments to measure self-care agency and social support of women in taiwan r[J]. Tile Kaohsiung journal of medical sci- ences,2000,16(9) :459 467.

二级参考文献17

共引文献147

同被引文献328

  • 1金自卫.24例肠造口周围刺激性皮炎原因分析及护理[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2010,17(6):37-39. 被引量:8
  • 2宋艳丽,王继忠,刘君位.肠造口用品:发展·现状·展望[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(6):433-434. 被引量:18
  • 3郭蕾蕾,路潜,王静.直肠癌结肠造口患者自我护理状况及健康需求的调查[J].解放军护理杂志,2006,23(1):26-27. 被引量:36
  • 4庄彩蓝,傅继勇.68例造口旁疝原因分析及护理[J].国际医药卫生导报,2007,13(10):101-103. 被引量:4
  • 5高启雯 顾乃平.结肠造口病人之生活品质.台湾医学,2007,5:164-171.
  • 6Finlayson E, Zhao S, Varma MG. Outcomes after rectal cancer surgery in elderly nursing home residents[l]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2012, 55 (12): 1229-1235.
  • 7Lee L, Saleem A, Landry T, et al. Cost effectiveness of mesh prophylaxis to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing permanent colostomy for rectal cancer[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 218 ( 1 ) : 82-91.
  • 8Dumont F, Ayadi M, Go 6 r 6 D, et al. Comparison of fecal continence and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection plus perineal colostomy for ultra-low rectal cancer[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2013, 108 ( 4 ) : 225-229.
  • 9Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61:69-90 [PMID: 21296855 DOI: 10.3322/ caac.20107].
  • 10Tannenbaum C, Brouillette J, Korner-Bitensky N, Dumoulin C, Corcos J, Tu le M, Lemieux MC, Ouellet S, Valiquette L. Creation and testing of the Geriatric Self-Efficacy Index for Urinary Incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56:542-547 [PMID: 18179504 DOI: 10.1111/ j.1532-5415.2007.01572.x].

引证文献36

二级引证文献269

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部