期刊文献+

我国商业银行系统性风险评估与实证研究——基于预期期望损失方法测度 被引量:4

Systemic Risk Assessment and Empirical Study of Commercial Bank of China:Based on Systemic Expected Shortfall Measurement
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章对我国商业银行系统性风险进行评估,采用系统性预期期望损失和边际预期期望损失两个测度变量,以此作为系统重要性指数,通过预期期望损失方法利用我国14家上市商业银行的面板数据评估我国商业银行系统性风险水平。实证结果表明:虽然国有银行系统重要性虽然占据主要地位,但系统性风险贡献排名却远低于其他商业银行,主要原因是国有银行的现金流更稳定,加上政府隐性担保及政策优惠对弱化系统性风险贡献度有很大帮助。另外我国中小城市商业银行更有可能带来系统性风险,因为股份制商业银行资产总规模虽然相对较小,但资产扩张速度过快、盈利大幅波动、资本充足率低且负债率较高,相比较国有银行更需要得到监管部门的重点监管。 This paper estimates systemic risk of commercial bank in our country by using systemic expected shortfall and marginal expected losses two measure variables as the systemic importance index, then we use the panel data of lg listed commercial banks in China to assess systemic risk level of Chinese commercial banks systemic by using expected shortfall loss method. The result shows that the importance of state-owned banking system occupies the dominant position,but systemic risk contribution is much lower than other commercial banks. The main reason is that state-owned banks have more stable cash flow, government's recessive guarantee and preferential policy, which help a lot to weaken the systemic risk contribution. Besides, the commercial banks in small cities of China are more likely to bring systemic risks for their assets rapid rate of expansion, volatility in earnings, low capital adequacy ratio and high debt ratio, even if their total size of assets are not so large. So compared with the state-owned banks, the commercial banks need more attention by China's financial supervision.
作者 冯超 谈颢阳
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第12期81-90,共10页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目"财政政策和信贷政策与产业政策的协调配合研究"(12AZD035) 国家自然科学基金创新群体"金融创新与风险管理"(71221001)
关键词 上市商业银行 系统性预期期望损失 边际期望损失 系统性风险 listed commercial banks systemic expected shortfall marginal expected loss systemic risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1BROWNLEES C T, EENGLE R F. Volatility, Correlation and Tails for Systemic Risk Measurement[ R]. Available at SSRN 1611229,2012.
  • 2ACHARYA V V,PEDERSEN L H,PHILIPPON T, et al. Measuring Systemic Risk [ R ]. CEPR Discussion Papers ,2012.
  • 3HUANG X,ZHOU H,ZHU H B. A Framework for Assessing the Systemic Risk of Major Financial Institution [ J]. Journal of Banking and Finance,2009,33 (11) :2036-2049.
  • 4BALAKRISHNAN M S. Strategic Branding of Destinations : A Framework [ J ]. European Journal of Marketing,2009,43 (5/6) : 611-629.
  • 5包全永.银行系统性风险的传染模型研究[J].金融研究,2005(8):72-84. 被引量:107
  • 6MILLER J. Interbank Credit Lines as a Channel of Contagion[ J]. Journal of Financial Services Research ,2006,29( 1 ) :37-60.
  • 7刘红忠,赵玉洁,周冬华.公允价值会计能否放大银行体系的系统性风险[J].金融研究,2011(4):82-99. 被引量:32
  • 8TARASHEV N, BORIO C, TSATSARONIS K. Attributing Systemic Risk to Individual Institutions [ R ]. Bank for International Settlements, 2010.
  • 9ADRIAN T, BRUNNERMEIER M. Covar: A Systemic Risk Contribution Measure [ R ]. Technical Representative, Princeton University, 2010.
  • 10贾彦东.金融机构的系统重要性分析——金融网络中的系统风险衡量与成本分担[J].金融研究,2011(10):17-33. 被引量:110

二级参考文献164

共引文献524

同被引文献86

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部